Fagan, FrankBilgel, Firat2024-05-252024-05-25201570144-81881873-639410.1016/j.irle.2014.08.0022-s2.0-84907835544https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.08.002https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/268BILGEL, FIRAT/0000-0002-2585-5975We test the hypothesis that the choice to include a sunset provision increases the likelihood that a bill becomes law. We develop a model where the legislator's knowledge of the increase in passage probability from including a sunset provision influences the legislator's choice to do so. Because legislators may either include a sunset provision to increase passage probability, or observe low passage probability and respond with a sunset provision, the choice to include a sunset provision is endogenous. Consequently, the causal effect of temporary enactment is identified by using the legislator's number of offspring as a source of exogenous variation in the choice to include a sunset provision. Employing recursive bivariate probit, we find that the average causal effect of including a sunset provision is sixty percent. We also find that the average causal effect of including sunset provisions in bills that already include them is about twenty percent. Published by Elsevier Inc.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessTiming rulesSunset legislationPassage probabilityInstrumental variablesBivariate probitArticleQ3Q24116WOS:000349427600001