Kaynar, Zeynep BuketDincer, Gozde AkbalDonmez, Nazmiye2025-03-152025-03-15202502167-835910.7717/peerj.190182-s2.0-85219014203https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19018Background: This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of immediate and delayed restorations after root canal treatment (RCT). Methods: Sixty human intact premolar teeth were used. Teeth were prepared disto-occlusally. After RCT, teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to restoration times (immediate or 3 months delayed). The three month delay was imitated by thermomechanical aging. Then, samples were divided into six subgroups (n = 10). While I (Composite resin), II (Flowable bulk-fill) and III (Ribbond+Flowable bulk-fill) were restored immediately, Groups IV, V and VI were restored with temporary filling material and stored in distilled. After subjected to thermo-cycling (2,500 cycles, 5-55 degrees C) and exposed to 60,000 cycles in a chewing simulator, Group IV (Composite resin), V (Flowable bulk-fill) and VI (Ribbond+Flowable bulk-fill) were restored. All of the teeth were fractured on the universal testing machine. Failure modes were analyzed using scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk and two-way ANOVA tests (p < 0.05). Results: The highest fracture resistance was recorded in Group III while the lowest in Group VI. No statistically significant difference was observed among groups (p > 0.05). Most of the repairable fractures were seen in Groups I and II. Conclusion: Delaying the permanent restorations of teeth for 3 months did not affect fracture resistance. However, it was suggested to avoid delaying restorations for obtaining repairable surfaces.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCompositeDelayed RestorationsRoot Canal TreatmentPolyethylene FiberFe-SemArticleQ2Q3132WOS:00146878010000140028222