Elter, B.Aladag, A.Comlekoglu, M. E.Dundar comlekoglu, M.Kesercioglu, A., I2024-05-252024-05-25202190045-04211834-781910.1111/adj.128372-s2.0-85103627622https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12837https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1614Elter, Bahar/0000-0002-8971-6819Background This study aimed to evaluate the colour stability of sectional laminate veneers (SLVs) fabricated with four and cemented with two different materials. Methods Eighty SLVs were prepared with a thickness of 0.2-0.4 mm from IPS e.max CAD, Lava Ultimate, CEREC Blocs and IPS InLine and were cemented with Variolink Veneer and Variolink N to form eight groups (n:10). After cementation, specimens underwent 5000 thermocyles prior to immersion in a coffee solution. Results Colour change before and after thermal cycling did not reveal significant differences (P > 0.05). After coffee immersion, significant colour change was observed in all groups (P > 0.05). Only IPS InLine cemented with Variolink Veneer was considered clinically acceptable ( increment E < 3.3). According to observer scorings, marginal discolouration was higher in Lava Ultimate, while no discolouration was observed in IPS InLine. Dual or light-curing resin cements showed insignificant differences. Conclusions SLVs fabricated with different aesthetic materials underwent perceptible ( increment E > 3.3) discolouration except for the IPS InLine cemented with light-curing resin cement. Cementation with either dual-curing or light-curing resin cements does not by itself affect colour stability. The highest marginal discolouration was in the Lava Ultimate group while no discolouration was detected in the IPS InLine group.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessColour stabilitydiscolorationlaminate veneersresin nano ceramicsectional veneersArticleQ3Q2663314323WOS:00063759910000133721347