Akgol, Beyza BalliUlukapi, IsinPedodonti / Pedodontic2024-05-252024-05-25202400275-18791754-450510.1111/scd.130142-s2.0-85192210326https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13014https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1187ObjectivesChildren, especially the mentally disabled, are generally incapable of obtaining adequate oral hygiene levels by manual brushing due to their lack of knowledge about oral hygiene and their limited motor skills. In order to handle those limited skills, different designs of manual and electric toothbrushes are developed and put on markets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pulsating toothbrushes with easy-to-use properties, against conventional toothbrushes and to analyze their benefits on mentally disabled pediatric patients.MethodsThirty-one healthy and 31 mentally disabled children (aged between 7 and 12) participated in this study. The effectiveness of three different toothbrushes (Oral-B Pulsar, Colgate 360 degrees Micro Sonic Power, Oral-B Stages 3) was investigated with a cross-over study design. DMFT, dft, modified sulcus bleeding index (MOD-SBI), approximal plaque index (API) and Green and Vermillion simplified oral hygiene index (G&V OHI-S) measurements are performed to evaluate the oral hygiene status.ResultsIn the mentally disabled group the manual toothbrush for MOD-SBI, and Colgate 360 degrees Micro Sonic Power for API showed the best results respectively.ConclusionThe ability of tooth brushing was improved both in healthy and in disabled children during this 5 months study. Unfortunately, it was not obvious in disabled children. Persevering training for tooth brushing might be the most important regardless of the kind of toothbrush.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessconventional toothbrushmentally disabled childrenplaque indexplaque removalpulsating toothbrushArticleQ3WOS:00121448040000138706153