Kurt, IremCehreli, Zafer CavitOzcirpici, Ayca ArmanSar, Cagla2024-05-252024-05-252019100003-32191945-710310.2319/072918-547.12-s2.0-85071469179https://doi.org/10.2319/072918-547.1https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1522ARMAN OZCIRPICI, AYCA/0000-0002-9250-3689; Sar, Cagla/0000-0003-4966-9779Objectives: To determine the best bonding method of orthodontic attachment among monolithic zirconia, feldspathic porcelain, hybrid porcelain, and the impact of surface-conditioning methods using a three-dimensional optical profilometer after debonding. Materials and Methods: 56 feldspathic porcelain, 56 monolithic zirconia, and 56 hybrid porcelain samples were divided into four surface treatment subgroups: (1) hydrofluoric (HF) acid etch + silane, (2) Al2O3 sandblasting + silane, (3) silicoating (SiO2), and (4) diamond bur + silane. The specimens were tested to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS). Residual composite was removed after debonding. Three-dimensional white-light interferometry was used to obtain quantitative measurements on surface roughness. Results: The highest SBS value was found for the HF acid-etched feldspathic porcelain group. The average surface roughness values were significantly higher in all material groups in which diamond bur was applied, while roughening with Cojet provided average surface roughness values closer to the original material surface. Conclusions: Variations in structures of the materials and roughening techniques affected the SBS and surface roughness findings.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThree-dimensional optical profilometrySurface roughnessShear bond strengthArticleQ2Q1895742750WOS:00048208500000930855180