Yildirim, SinemTokuc, MugeAydin, Merve NurPedodonti / Pedodontic2024-05-252024-05-25202061432-69811436-377110.1007/s00784-020-03301-92-s2.0-85084967084https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03301-9https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2167Tokuc, Muge/0000-0002-3933-9998; yildirim, sinem/0000-0002-8647-0534Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pain control between a needle-free system and topical anesthesia applied prior to inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Materials and methods The present study was designed as a randomized controlled cross-over clinical study on 60 children (aged 6 to 12 years) requiring dental treatment with IANB in bilateral mandibular molars. As pre-anesthesia, topical anesthesia (TA) was applied on one side and the Comfort-in (TM) injection system (CIS) on the other side in two separate sessions before IANB. The injection pain during IANB, at both the needle insertion and solution deposition phases, was analyzed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (PRS) and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC). The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman correlation, and Mann-Whitney U test. Results There were statistically significant differences between TA and CIS in subjective and objective pain evaluations during both the needle insertion and solution deposition. The use of a needle-free system in pre-anesthesia yielded a significant decrease in subjective and objective pain scores (p < 0.001). No statistical difference was found between TA and CIS in terms of patient preference, but patient preference for CIS was significantly higher in older patients (p < 0.01). Conclusions It was determined that the use of a needle-free system in pre-anesthesia yielded a decrease in injection pain of IANB.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessLocal anesthesiaInjection painInferior alveolar nerve blockPain managementArticleQ2Q1241243554361WOS:00053098280000632382924