Kholmetskii, Alexander L.Yarman, TolgaYarman, OzanArik, Metin2024-05-252024-05-2520160003-49161096-035X10.1016/j.aop.2016.08.0162-s2.0-84984850849https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2016.08.016https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/206arik, metin/0000-0001-9512-8581; Yarman, Tolga/0000-0003-3209-2264; Yarman, Ozan U./0000-0001-9002-3326We show that a new attempt by Corda (2016), just like his previous attempt (Corda, 2015) that we had answered before (A.L. Kholmetskii et al., 2015), to reinterpret Mossbauer experiments in a rotating system as a "new, strong and independent proof of the correctness of Einstein's vision of gravity" is erroneous. In addition, we demonstrate that Corda's criticism of Yarman-Arik-Kholmetskii gravitation theory (in short YARK), is based on the application of ill-posed logic; thus rendering his claims against YARK as unfounded. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMossbauer effectRotating systemsTime dilation effectGeneral theory of relativityResponse to "The Mossbauer rotor experiment and the general theory of relativity" by C. CordaArticleQ2Q2374247254WOS:00038806310001315