Browsing by Author "Kokat, Ali Murat"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Citation Count: 21
Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study
(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2021) Cakmak, Gulce; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Atalay, Sevda; Yilmaz, Hakan; Kokat, Ali Murat; Yilmaz, Burak
Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system using different intraoral scanners. Methods: A partially edentulous model with an implant was fabricated, and a CHA-SB system was secured on the implant. The model was scanned using an industrial-grade blue light scanner (ATOS Core 80) and a master reference model was generated (MRM). The model was also scanned with 4 different intraoral scanners (IOSs) [(Virtuo Vivo (VV), TRIOS 3 (T3), Omnicam (CO), and Primescan (PS)]. Test scans (n = 8) were superimposed over the MRM using the best fit algorithm (GOM Inspect 2018; GOM GmbH). After superimpositions, distance and angular deviations at selected areas on CHA-SB system were calculated. The data were analyzed with a 1way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests for trueness and precision (alpha=0.05). Results: The differences in trueness (distance deviations) among tested IOSs were nonsignificant (P=.652). VV presented the highest angular deviations (P <=.031), and the angular deviations in other IOS scans were not found different (P >=.378). The precision of distance deviation data was not significantly different among scanners (P=.052). For the precision of angular deviation data, significant differences were found among IOSs (P=.002). Compared with PS (P=.007) and T3 (P=.014), VV had significantly lower precision, which was not significantly different than that of CO (P=.815). Conclusions: The accuracy (angular deviation) of scans of a combined healing abutment-scan body system on a single implant varied depending on the IOS. VirtuoVivo scans had the lowest accuracy in terms of angular deviations. When the distance deviation data were considered, scan accuracy of scanners was similar. Clinical Significance: A recently introduced combined healing abutment-scan body system combines the acquisition of both the implant and the soft tissue. When different intraoral scanners scan the combined healing abutment-scan body system, the scan accuracy may vary.
Citation Count: 9
Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study
(Wiley, 2022) Cakmak, Gulce; Yilmaz, Hakan; Santos, Alejandro Trevino; Kokat, Ali Murat; Yilmaz, Burak
Purpose To compare the accuracy (trueness and precision) of scans of a newly introduced intraoral scanner (IOS) (Virtuo Vivo) and a widely used IOS (Trios 3) to a laboratory scanner (LBS) (Cares 7 SERIES) for 6 implants placed in an edentulous mandible, and to investigate the effect of scan body location on trueness. Material and methods Scanbodies were tightened on 6 implants placed in an edentulous polymethylmethacrylate mandibular model. An industrial scanner was utilized to generate a master reference model STL file. Three different scanners were used to scan the model (2 IOSs and 1 LBS), and the scans (n = 10) were exported into STL files. Best-fitting algorithm was used to superimpose test scans over the MRM-STL (nominal). ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were performed to analyze the data (alpha = 0.05). Results The distance deviations in Car7-LBS scans were the highest (p < 0.001), whereas those in Tri-IOS scans were the lowest (p < 0.001). Vir-IOS had lower angular deviations than those of Tri-IOS (p = 0.031). In Vir-IOS scans, SB5 had higher distance deviations than SB2 (p = 0.029) and SB3 (p = 0.044). In Car7-LBS scans, SB1 had higher distance deviations than SB3 (p = 0.015) and SB5 (p = 0.005). In Tri-IOS scans, SB1 had higher mean distance deviations than SB2 and SB5 (p = 0.005). Vir-IOS had lower precision than Car7-LBS (distance deviation data) (p = 0.01). No difference was found among scanners for the precision of angular deviation data (p = 0.840). Conclusion When trueness and precision were considered, distance and angular deviations depended on the scanner type. None of the scanners outperformed others in accuracy considering all distance and angular deviations. Scan body location affected only the trueness (distance deviations).
Citation Count: 39
The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans
(Wiley, 2020) Cakmak, Gulce; Yilmaz, Hakan; Trevino, Alejandro; Kokat, Ali Murat; Yilmaz, Burak
Background How the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans is affected when different intraoral scanners (IOSs) are used and the effect of scan body position on the accuracy are not well-known. Purpose To compare the scan accuracy (trueness and precision) of a recently introduced IOS (Virtuo Vivo) to a commonly used IOS (TRIOS 3) and the scans of a laboratory scanner (LBS; Cares 7 SERIES) in a completely edentulous maxilla with four implants. It was also aimed to evaluate the effect of scan body position on the accuracy. Materials and Methods Multi-unit scan bodies were tightened on a poly(methyl methacrylate) edentulous maxillary model with four implants. A master reference model (MRM) stereolithography (STL) file was generated by scanning the model with a high-precision scanner. The model was scanned with three different scanners (n = 10); two different IOSs and a LBS. STL files were superimposed over the MRM. Results For trueness, scan body position (P= .004) and scanner type (P < .001) had a significant effect on distance deviation and a significant interaction was found (P= .001). For angular deviation, only scanner type had a significant effect (P= .028). For precision, significant difference was found for distance (P= .011) and angular deviations (P= .020) between different scanner types. Conclusions One scanner type was not superior to others when both trueness and precision were considered. Position of the scan body affected the distance deviation (trueness).