Efficiency and accuracy of three-dimensional models versus dental casts: A clinical study

dc.authorscopusid57210447211
dc.authorscopusid57216783998
dc.authorscopusid24176861200
dc.authorscopusid37067560400
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz,H.
dc.contributor.authorÖzlü,F.Ç.
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz,C.
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz,E.I.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:33:03Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:33:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempYilmaz H., Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul Okan University School of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey; Özlü F.Ç., Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey; Karadeniz C., Department of Orthodontics, James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Cairns, Australia; Karadeniz E.I., Department of Orthodontics, James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Cairns, Australiaen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital and plaster model methods and the time required for analysis. Methods: A total of 30 subjects (20 females, 10 males; mean age, 14.36±6.30 years), who required plaster models for the construction of either a fixed or a removable orthodontic appliance, were randomly selected. As part of the diagnostic records, digital impressions with a three-dimensional (3D) intra-oral scanner (TriosColor-P13 Shape) were taken from all subjects. Conventional impressions for the orthodontic appliances were taken with alginate (Orthoprint, Zhermack, Italy), and the plaster models were obtained (Scheu-Dental, GmbH.D-58642, Iserlohn, Germany). Two groups were formed. In the conventional measurement group, manual measurements were taken on the plaster models, while in the digital measurement group, the 3Shape OrthoAnalyzer 2013 software was used to make the measurements on the 3D models. In both groups, the total time required to perform the Bolton analysis and space analysis was recorded, and the results were compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference found between the two groups in terms of the measurement values. The total time to perform all the analyses was determined to be shorter with digital models compared to conventional plaster models (p<0.001). Conclusion: The Bolton analysis and space analysis measurements carried out on 3D models did not show any statistically significant difference compared to plaster models. The time taken to perform the analyses was shorter using digital models than for conventional plaster models. © Copyright 2019 by Turkish Orthodontic Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citation5
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TURKJORTHOD.2019.19034
dc.identifier.endpage218en_US
dc.identifier.issn2528-9659
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084671527
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage214en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TURKJORTHOD.2019.19034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2432
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAVESen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental modelsen_US
dc.subjectImagingen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectSoftwareen_US
dc.subjectThree-dimensionalen_US
dc.titleEfficiency and accuracy of three-dimensional models versus dental casts: A clinical studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files