THE COMPARISON OF THE PRECISION OF DIFFERENT DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC METHODS IN MANDIBULAR PERI-IMPLANTARY MEASUREMENTS: AN IN VITRO STUDY

dc.authoridGECKILI, ONUR/0000-0002-7852-3915
dc.authoridBilhan, Hakan/0000-0003-1787-3003
dc.authorwosidunalan, fatma/AAD-7919-2020
dc.authorwosidGECKILI, ONUR/AAD-4973-2020
dc.contributor.authorBilhan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorGeckili, Onur
dc.contributor.authorBilhan, Selda Arat
dc.contributor.authorAycicek, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Berkman
dc.contributor.authorBozbulut, Pelin
dc.contributor.authorUnalan, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:18:01Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:18:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Bilhan, Hakan; Geckili, Onur; Aycicek, Fatih; Unalan, Fatma] Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey; [Bilhan, Selda Arat] Medipol Mega Hosp & Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Bagcilar Istanbul, Turkey; [Albayrak, Berkman; Bozbulut, Pelin] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Fatih Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionGECKILI, ONUR/0000-0002-7852-3915; Bilhan, Hakan/0000-0003-1787-3003en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate and compare the precisions of several radiodiagnostic methods used in dentistry for the measurement of peri-implantary sites. Materials and Methods: Six dental implants were placed in a human cadaver mandible. Periapical radiographs obtained with the parallel as well as the bisecting angle technique, digital and conventional panoramic radiographs were used for implant and peri-implant bone measurements. The measurement results at each implant were statistically analyzed. Results: The ICC values for the inter-observer reliability were 0.79 for implant diameters and 0.96 for implant lengths. Statistical significance was not detected between the differences of the measurements of the 2 examiners from the original implant dimensions related to anatomic locations. For both of the examiner measurements, significantly less difference from the original implant dimensions was detected in the parallel technique compared to the other techniques (p< 0.05). Conclusion: The present study showed that the most precise peri-implant bone measurements can be obtained from periapical radiographies by using the parallel technique.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.17096/jiufd.55134
dc.identifier.endpage9en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-2352
dc.identifier.issn2149-4592
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28955519
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.55134
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/278
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000409812300001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ Press, Istanbul Univ Rectorateen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPanoramic radiographyen_US
dc.subjectdental implantationen_US
dc.subjectparallel techniqueen_US
dc.subjectbisecting techniqueen_US
dc.subjectperiapical radiographyen_US
dc.titleTHE COMPARISON OF THE PRECISION OF DIFFERENT DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC METHODS IN MANDIBULAR PERI-IMPLANTARY MEASUREMENTS: AN IN VITRO STUDYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files