EVALUATION OF THE SURFACE DETAIL REPRODUCTION OF IMPRESSION MATERIALS USED FOR OCULAR PROSTHESES

dc.authoridSahan, Makbule Heval/0000-0003-0825-8914
dc.authorwosidŞahan, Makbule Heval/HGD-3556-2022
dc.contributor.authorSahan, Makbule Heval
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Niler Ozdemir
dc.contributor.authorAras, Engin
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T20:21:01Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T20:21:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Sahan, Makbule Heval] Ege Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Izmir, Turkey; [Akkus, Niler Ozdemir] Okan Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Aras, Engin] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Toronto, ON, Canadaen_US
dc.descriptionSahan, Makbule Heval/0000-0003-0825-8914en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the surface detail reproduction of faux types of impression materials compatible for the socket impression in the fabrication of ocular prosthesis. Material and Method: Three alginate impression materials (orthoprint(OP), Ca37(C), Ophthalmic Alginate (OA) and a polyvinyl siloxane material (Minis (P)) have been tested. A total of 40 impressions were made of stainless steel metal dies (ADA specification 19). The dies had 2 vertical and 3 horizontal lines inscribed on their superior surfaces. The measurements have been conducted on the 20-50-75 mu m horizontal lines on the surface of the impression. Surface detail reproduction was evaluated using a microscope at 80X magnification. Statistical analysis was performed (one-way ANOVA and Bon errant alpha=0.05). Results: Polyvinyl siloxane material resulted in the highest values and showed the most accurate surface at all of the 20-50-75 mu m lines; whereas, lowest values were observed with Orthoprint. Conclusion: Polyvinyl siloxane impression material showed the highest surface detail necessary for the construction of an ocular prosthesis among other impression materials tested.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi[WOS-DOI-BELIRLENECEK-47]
dc.identifier.endpage38en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-2381
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage33en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/6596
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000508954100005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNobel Ilacen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOcular prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectimpression materialsen_US
dc.subjectsurface detailen_US
dc.titleEVALUATION OF THE SURFACE DETAIL REPRODUCTION OF IMPRESSION MATERIALS USED FOR OCULAR PROSTHESESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files