A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF EXTRACTION AND NONEXTRACTION ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS ON CEPHALOMETRIC PARAMETERS AND ARCH WIDTHS;

dc.authorscopusid57115461200
dc.authorscopusid58002466300
dc.authorscopusid57222511270
dc.authorscopusid58002726100
dc.contributor.authorYavan,M.A.
dc.contributor.authorGuler,S.
dc.contributor.authorEglenen,M.N.
dc.contributor.authorKaraca,M.N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:34:02Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:34:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempYavan M.A., Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Adıyaman University, Turkey; Guler S., Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Adıyaman University, Turkey; Eglenen M.N., Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Okan University, İstanbul, Turkey; Karaca M.N., Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the effects of two different treatment approaches on cephalometric measurements and arch widths. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study evaluated pre and post-treatment cephalometric radiograms and dental models of 45 patients with Class I malocclusions and moderate-severe dental tooth size arch length discrepancies that underwent extraction or nonextraction treatment between 2015 and 2020. Group I (n=22 [9 female, 13 male]; mean age, 18.0 ± 1.68 years) was treated with the Damon Q bracket system and Group II (n=23 [11 female, 12 male]; mean age, 17.9 ± 1.34 years) was treated with the conventional MBT bracket system. Pre and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiograms were obtained and arch widths were measured for each subject. Paired samples t-test was used to evaluate the treatment changes within each group. To compare the changes between groups, independent samples t-test was performed. Results: No significant change was detected in the sagittal and vertical skeletal parameters in both groups (p>0.05). The upper and lower incisors proclined significantly in Group I (p<0.01) and the mandibular incisors retroclined significantly in Group II (p<0.05). The lips protruded significantly and the upper lip thickness decreased significantly in Group I (p<0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in Group II (p>0.05). All the transversal dimensions increased significantly in Group I (p<0.01), while only the intermolar distances decreased significantly in Group II (p<0.01). Conclusions: Both treatment methods provided significantly different outcomes with regard to soft tissue parameters and arch widths. © 2021, Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cumudj.812131
dc.identifier.endpage56en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143862848
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1109383
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.812131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2526
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectExtractionen_US
dc.subjectNonextractionen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.titleA COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF EXTRACTION AND NONEXTRACTION ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS ON CEPHALOMETRIC PARAMETERS AND ARCH WIDTHS;en_US
dc.title.alternativeÇekimli ve Çekimsiz Ortodontik Tedavilerin Sefalometrik Yapılar ve Ark Genişlikleri Üzerine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılmasıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files