A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF REGISTRATION METHODS USED IN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN CULTURAL HERITAGE APPLICATIONS

dc.authoridGümüş, Münevver Gizem/0000-0003-4606-2277
dc.authorscopusid36348344200
dc.authorscopusid57199749969
dc.authorscopusid35317359300
dc.authorwosidGümüş, Münevver Gizem/O-6514-2017
dc.contributor.authorGumus, Kutalmis
dc.contributor.authorGumus, M. Gizem
dc.contributor.authorErkaya, Halil
dc.contributor.otherGeomatik Mühendisliği / Geomatics Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:20:21Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:20:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Gumus, Kutalmis; Gumus, M. Gizem] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Nigde, Turkey; [Erkaya, Halil] Okan Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionGümüş, Münevver Gizem/0000-0003-4606-2277en_US
dc.description.abstractTerrestrial laser scanning (TLS) systems are used during surveying in cultural heritage applications, supported by recent developments in the electronics and computing. The aim of this article is to present a statistical study of the accuracy of registration methods (target (sphere), specific point and surface-matching) used for merged of the scans captured from different scan stations. A Mensi GS 100 terrestrial laser scanner was used to scan an historical building. The point clouds reflecting the building facade were registered using these registration methods and were transformed into the same geodesic coordinate system. A Leica TPS 1200 Total Station was used to measure the coordinates of specific points on the building facade and compare them with the coordinates of the same points using three different scan-registration methods. The t-student test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used for point-and method-based comparisons, and it was found that the coordinates did not exhibit any statistically significant variation. Better results were obtained with target-based registration methods compared to other methods, and with surface-matching methods compared to methods using specific points. Although the results of the registration methods used in this study had certain similarities, variation in their accuracy was determined to be statistically significant.en_US
dc.identifier.citation3
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.1005466
dc.identifier.endpage64en_US
dc.identifier.issn1108-9628
dc.identifier.issn2241-8121
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85038353087
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage53en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1005466
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/478
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000418897300005
dc.institutionauthorErkaya H.
dc.institutionauthorErkaya, Halil
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniv Agean, dept Mediterranean Studen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectTerrestrial Laser Scanningen_US
dc.subjectStatistical analyzeen_US
dc.subjectPoint Clouden_US
dc.subjectRegistrationen_US
dc.subjectCultural Heritageen_US
dc.titleA STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF REGISTRATION METHODS USED IN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN CULTURAL HERITAGE APPLICATIONSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication81d70de5-6fac-43b8-b69f-73013d27cba0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery81d70de5-6fac-43b8-b69f-73013d27cba0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd059711f-20db-424d-8722-3ca9ed561a97
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd059711f-20db-424d-8722-3ca9ed561a97

Files