Updating the Signal-to-cutoff Level to Reduce Anti-hepatitis C Virus False Positivity

dc.authorid ozturk, servet/0000-0002-9114-5090
dc.contributor.author Ozturk, Servet
dc.contributor.author Agalar, Canan
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:26:37Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:26:37Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Ozturk, Servet] Okan Univ, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Agalar, Canan] Fenerbahce Univ, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description ozturk, servet/0000-0002-9114-5090 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) is the only screening test being used in the diagnosis of hepatitis C. In this study, we examined anti-HCV positivity rates in our hospital. Objectives: The aim of administering the anti-HCV test was to distinguish patients with hepatitis C infection from false positivity in patients with reactive results. Methods: The anti-HCV tests were performed at Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The patients were evaluated retrospectively in terms of age, gender, anti-HCV titer, the clinic for which the examination was requested, the reason for the examination, and the history of hepatitis C. Results: In this study, 511 patients who had two negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were evaluated as false positive cases and enrolled. The cut-off value was found to be 7.5 IU/ml, with the highest sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 94.5% (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.982). The lowest anti-HCV titer (5.2) was from patients without acute hepatitis, who were HCV-RNA positive and diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C. Conclusions: It may be more appropriate to report anti-HCV cut-off value of 0 - 5 as negative, 5 - 7.5 as borderline, and > 7.5 as positive. Working with a more acceptable cut-off level with a greater number of tests can help identify patients with asymptomatic HCV infection. Also, it can possibly reduce the cost due to a decrease in the number of PCR tests administered. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.5812/jjm.119110
dc.identifier.issn 2008-3645
dc.identifier.issn 2008-4161
dc.identifier.issue 10 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.119110
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1000
dc.identifier.volume 14 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000734633400004
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Kowsar Publ en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Anti-hepatitis C virus en_US
dc.subject False Positive en_US
dc.subject Hepatitis C virus en_US
dc.subject Signal-to-cutoff en_US
dc.subject S en_US
dc.subject Co en_US
dc.title Updating the Signal-to-cutoff Level to Reduce Anti-hepatitis C Virus False Positivity en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0

Files