Recommended Surgical Margins for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Is 3 mm Safe Enough?

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2020

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The primary aim of treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the complete excision of the tumor. Reconstruction of the defect after surgical excision varies, depending on the location and size of the defect and the skin to be used in the reconstruction. In this study, investigators compared the rates of tumor positivity at the edges of BCC specimens excised with 3- or 5-mm surgical margins. METHODS Researchers analyzed data related to 113 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of BCC between August 2016 and June 2018. In total, 99 lesions from 91 patients not exceeding 2 cm in size excised with 3-mm (n = 53) or 5-mm (n = 46) surgical margins were included. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi(2) test. RESULTS After histopathologic assessment, 3 of 53 lesions that were excised with 3-mm surgical margins had a positive surgical margin, whereas none of the 46 lesions excised with 5-mm margins indicated a positive tumor presence. However, there was no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS A 3-mm surgical margin may be sufficient and safe for BCC excision.

Description

Unverdi, Omer Faruk/0000-0001-8560-7300

Keywords

basal cell carcinoma, cancer, excision, reconstruction, surgical margin, tumor, wound care

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

7

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q2

Source

Volume

33

Issue

4

Start Page

209

End Page

212