Sürenkök, Özgür

Profile Picture
Name Variants
Surenkok O.
Surenkok, Ozgur
Surenkok, Özgür
Ö., Sürenkök
Ozgur Surenkok
SURENKOK Ozgur
Surenkok Ozgur
Sürenkök, Özgür
Özgür Sürenkök
SÜRENKÖK Özgür
Özgür, Sürenkök
Surenkok, O.
Surenkok, Ö.
Ozgur SURENKOK
SÜRENKÖK Ö.
Özgür SÜRENKÖK
Sürenkök Özgür
Sürenkök, Ö.
Job Title
Dr.Öğr.Üyesi
Email Address
ozgur.surenkok@okan.edu.tr
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Scholarly Output

2

Articles

2

Citation Count

1

Supervised Theses

0

Filters

2021 - 20252
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 0
    Impact of Blood Flow Restriction Intensity on Pain Perception and Muscle Recovery Post-Eccentric Exercise
    (Wiley, 2025) Sürenkök, Özgür; Aydın, Gamze; Kendal, Kübra; Atıcı, Emine; Atici, Emine; Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    BackgroundDelayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a well-established phenomenon characterized by ultrastructural muscle damage that typically develops following unfamiliar or high-intensity exercise. DOMS manifests with a constellation of symptoms, including muscle tenderness, stiffness, edema, mechanical hyperalgesia, and a reduced range of joint motion. In recent years, the application of blood flow restriction (BFR) has garnered attention for its potential impact on DOMS.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of different BFR intensities on biomechanical alterations induced by DOMS in healthy individuals.Design and MethodsThirty participants were split into two groups receiving either 80% or 20% BFR applied during low-intensity resistance exercise following DOMS induction. Pain perception, pressure pain threshold, muscle biometric characteristics, and strength were assessed before DOMS, after DOMS, and following BFR application at 24, 48, and 72 h.ResultsThe 80% BFR group experienced faster reductions in pain perception compared to the 20% BFR group. Muscle strength recovery was also statistically faster in the 80% BFR group. No significant differences were observed between groups in muscle stiffness, flexibility, or other mechanical properties.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that BFR, particularly at higher intensities, may alleviate DOMS symptoms and accelerate muscle strength recovery. However, the lack of a control group and limitations in muscle property assessment warrant further research to definitively determine BFR's efficacy in managing DOMS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 1
    EFFECTS OF SUBSCAPULARIS MUSCLE SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION ON PAIN AND FUNCTIONALITY IN SHOULDER DYSFUNCTION
    (Turkey Assoc Physiotherapists, 2021) Atici, Emine; Atıcı, Emine; Aydın, Gamze; Sürenkök, Özgür; Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    Purpose: Tightness of the subscapularis muscle causes glenohumeral external rotation limitation and difficulties in over-head activities. This study aimed to determine the effects of soft tissue mobilization applied to the subscapularis muscle on pain and functionality in shoulder dysfunctions. Methods: The 48 patients with shoulder pain and limitation were included in the study. They were randomly divided into conventional physiotherapy program (CPP) group (n=25) and soft tissue mobilization (STM) group (n=23). The first group received CPP and the second group received STM. All patients had treatment at a physiotherapy clinic for 15 sessions. The pain was evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), shoulder joint movements were measured using a goniometer and overhead reach test, and functionality was evaluated using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The patients were assessed before, immediately after, and three weeks after the treatment. Results: Statistically significant improvements were found in VAS, shoulder flexion and extemal rotation range of motion, and overhead reach test in both groups immediately after treatment and at the end of the 3rd week (p<0.05). When groups were compared after three weeks, statistically significant improvements were found in VAS, external rotation range of motion, and overhead reach test in the STM group (p<0.05). There was a statistically significant improvement in SPADI in both groups after the treatment (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in SPADI score between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The STM was more effective on pain, range of motion, and functionality than CPP. STM of subscapularis muscle might be an alternative treatment of the shoulder dysfunction.