Eraydın, Nihal

Profile Picture
Name Variants
Nihal ERAYDIN
ERAYDIN Nihal
ERAYDiN Nihal
Nihal, Eraydın
Eraydın Nihal
Eraydin, Nihal
Nihal Eraydin
Eraydin Nihal
N., Eraydın
Eraydin, N.
Eraydın, N.
Eraydın, Nihal
Nihal ERAYDiN
Nihal Eraydın
Job Title
Dr.Öğr.Üyesi
Email Address
nihal.eraydin@okan.edu.tr
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Citation Count

0

Supervised Theses

0

Filters

20241
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 0
    Efficiency of oral keratinized gingiva detection and measurement based on convolutional neural network
    (Wiley, 2024) Aykol-Sahin, Gokce; Yucel, Ozgun; Eraydin, Nihal; Keles, Gonca Cayir; Unlu, Umran; Baser, Ulku; Periodontoloji / Periodontology
    Background: With recent advances in artificial intelligence, the use of this technology has begun to facilitate comprehensive tissue evaluation and planning of interventions. This study aimed to assess different convolutional neural networks (CNN) in deep learning algorithms to detect keratinized gingiva based on intraoral photos and evaluate the ability of networks to measure keratinized gingiva width. Methods: Six hundred of 1200 photographs taken before and after applying a disclosing agent were used to compare the neural networks in segmenting the keratinized gingiva. Segmentation performances of networks were evaluated using accuracy, intersection over union, and F1 score. Keratinized gingiva width from a reference point was measured from ground truth images and compared with the measurements of clinicians and the DeepLab image that was generated from the ResNet50 model. The effect of measurement operators, phenotype, and jaw on differences in measurements was evaluated by three-factor mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Among the compared networks, ResNet50 distinguished keratinized gingiva at the highest accuracy rate of 91.4%. The measurements between deep learning and clinicians were in excellent agreement according to jaw and phenotype. When analyzing the influence of the measurement operators, phenotype, and jaw on the measurements performed according to the ground truth, there were statistically significant differences in measurement operators and jaw (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Automated keratinized gingiva segmentation with the ResNet50 model might be a feasible method for assisting professionals. The measurement results promise a potentially high performance of the model as it requires less time and experience.