The interdependence of electronic energy, period of time, mass and internuclear distance displayed by any object, Part 2: Molecular derivation and application to chemically alike molecules

dc.authorscopusid6602787345
dc.authorscopusid56631476600
dc.authorscopusid52564111600
dc.contributor.authorYarman,T.
dc.contributor.authorYarman,F.
dc.contributor.authorÖzaydin,F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:31:04Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:31:04Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempYarman T., Okan University, Akfirat, Istanbul, Turkey; Yarman F., Havelsan Inc, Ankara, Turkey; Özaydin F., Okan University, Akfirat, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study, based on mere considerations induced by the Special Theory of Relativity, has previously established the following relationship between the "minimum electronic energy" Emin, and the related "classical vibration frequency" ω, in regards to electronic states of a given diatomic molecule: |Emin|=4π2M0gkω2Rmin2 Where M0 is the reduced mass of the molecule, Rmin the "internuclear distance" associated with ω, and gk a Lorentz invariant dimensionless coefficient, insuring the equality; it depends only on the electronic structure of the molecule; therefore for electronic states configured similarly, we expect the coefficient gk, to remain practically the same; it takes values, roughly around unity. The framework in question is interesting, given that, for alike electronic states of a given molecule, Emin versus M0ω2Rmin2, should behave linearly. This further, should allow the determination of gk, for the states in consideration. The expression is anyway valid for any diatomic molecule, along with a given gk. On the other hand, the "ground states" of bonds delineating chemical similarities, display "alike electronic configurations". This means that, gk for such bonds, should remain practically the same. Thus, regarding the ground states of such molecules, Emin versus M0ω2Rmin2 should further be expected to behave linearly (the quantities of concern, now being exclusively assigned to the ground states of the molecules in question). We check this prediction successfully for the entire body of diatomic molecules and calculate gk, for different "chemical families". The relationship we discover has got as much predictive power as that provided by the classical quantum mechanical tools; it is though incomparably simpler and faster. © 2011 Academic Journals.en_US
dc.identifier.citation4
dc.identifier.doi10.5897/sre10.1155
dc.identifier.endpage4491en_US
dc.identifier.issn1992-2248
dc.identifier.issue21en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80053608472
dc.identifier.startpage4478en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5897/sre10.1155
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2248
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Research and Essaysen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectQuantum mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectSpecial theory of relativityen_US
dc.titleThe interdependence of electronic energy, period of time, mass and internuclear distance displayed by any object, Part 2: Molecular derivation and application to chemically alike moleculesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files