Updating the Signal-to-cutoff Level to Reduce Anti-hepatitis C Virus False Positivity

dc.authorscopusid57216472351
dc.authorscopusid6602534012
dc.contributor.authorOztürk,S.
dc.contributor.authorAğalar,C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:34:04Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:34:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempOztürk S., Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey; Ağalar C., Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Fenerbahçe University, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) is the only screening test being used in the diagnosis of hepatitis C. In this study, we examined anti-HCV positivity rates in our hospital. Objectives: The aim of administering the anti-HCV test was to distinguish patients with hepatitis C infection from false positivity in patients with reactive results. Methods: The anti-HCV tests were performed at Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The patients were evaluated retrospectively in terms of age, gender, anti-HCV titer, the clinic for which the examination was requested, the reason for the examination, and the history of hepatitis C. Results: In this study, 511 patients who had two negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were evaluated as false positive cases and enrolled. The cut-off value was found to be 7.5 IU/ml, with the highest sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 94.5% (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.982). The lowest anti-HCV titer (5.2) was from patients without acute hepatitis, who were HCV-RNA positive and diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C. Conclusions: It may be more appropriate to report anti-HCV cut-off value of 0-5 as negative, 5-7.5 as borderline, and > 7.5 as positive. Working with a more acceptable cut-off level with a greater number of tests can help identify patients with asymptomatic HCV infection. Also, it can possibly reduce the cost due to a decrease in the number of PCR tests administered. © 2021, Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.5812/JJM.119110
dc.identifier.issn2008-3645
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125112344
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5812/JJM.119110
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2534
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKowsar Medical Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJundishapur Journal of Microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnti-hepatitis C virusen_US
dc.subjectFalse positiveen_US
dc.subjectHepatitis C virusen_US
dc.subjectS/Coen_US
dc.subjectSignal-to-cutoffen_US
dc.titleUpdating the Signal-to-cutoff Level to Reduce Anti-hepatitis C Virus False Positivityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files