Clinical Comparison of Screw-Retained and Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections: One-Year Postloading Results

dc.contributor.author Geckili, Esma
dc.contributor.author Geckili, Onur
dc.contributor.author Bilhan, Hakan
dc.contributor.author Kutay, Omer
dc.contributor.author Bilgin, Tayfun
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:20:39Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:20:39Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description bilgin, tayfun/0000-0002-7746-4909; GECKILI, ONUR/0000-0002-7852-3915; Bilhan, Hakan/0000-0003-1787-3003 en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clinically evaluate the screwless Morse taper implant-abutment connection type, in which the retention screw is totally eliminated, in terms of stability, success, periodontal parameters, and marginal bone levels after 1 year of function by comparing it with a passive fit internal implantabutment connection, wherein a space exists between the matching components. Materials and Methods: Each edentulous subject received an implant with a screwless Morse taper connection (MT) in the left canine area of the mandible and an implant with a screw-retained implant-abutment connection (SR) in the right canine area of the mandible. All implants were loaded 6 weeks later. All cases were restored with a cemented bar-retained mandibular overdenture opposing a maxillary complete denture. Clinical recalls at 6 months and 12 months postloading were scheduled and the MT and SR implants were compared in terms of success, survival, primary and secondary implant stability, marginal bone loss, soft tissue response, and mechanical complications. The results were statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 20 subjects were included (10 females, 10 males; average age: 61.60 years) and a total of 40 implants were inserted. No implant failure or technical problem was detected for either MT or SR implants. Marginal bone loss around MT and SR implants did not show any significant differences at 6 weeks after surgery (time of loading) or at 6 months or 12 months postloading (P >.05). Periodontal parameters such as gingival index and probing pocket depth of MT and SR implants likewise did not differ significantly at 6 months and 12 months postloading (P >.05). Primary stability values of MT and SR implants did not differ significantly when measured with the insertion torque device (mean of 68.10 Ncm for MT and 64.20 Ncm for SR implants; P =.564), nor when measured with the electronic percussive testing device (mean of -5.30 for the MT and -5.35 for the SR implants; P =.398). However, MT implants showed lower stability at the time of loading (6 weeks) and 6 months postloading (P =.037 and P =.003, respectively). Stability values did not show any significant differences 12 months postloading (P >.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this clinical study, it can be concluded that implants with screwless Morse taper and passive fit internal connections show comparable technical and biologic results after 1 year of function. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 5
dc.identifier.doi 10.11607/jomi.5314
dc.identifier.issn 0882-2786
dc.identifier.issn 1942-4434
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85029582511
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5314
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/522
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Quintessence Publishing Co inc en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject dental implant en_US
dc.subject Morse taper en_US
dc.subject screwless Morse taper en_US
dc.title Clinical Comparison of Screw-Retained and Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections: One-Year Postloading Results en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id bilgin, tayfun/0000-0002-7746-4909
gdc.author.id GECKILI, ONUR/0000-0002-7852-3915
gdc.author.id Bilhan, Hakan/0000-0003-1787-3003
gdc.author.scopusid 55875570800
gdc.author.scopusid 15135391400
gdc.author.scopusid 35267920900
gdc.author.scopusid 7801579391
gdc.author.scopusid 22933699600
gdc.author.wosid bilgin, tayfun/AAD-7859-2020
gdc.author.wosid GECKILI, ONUR/AAD-4973-2020
gdc.author.wosid Sakar, Olcay/AAD-4997-2020
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Okan University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Geckili, Esma; Geckili, Onur; Kutay, Omer; Bilgin, Tayfun] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 2nd Floor, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkey; [Bilhan, Hakan] Okan Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 1131 en_US
gdc.description.issue 5 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 1123 en_US
gdc.description.volume 32 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.pmid 28212454
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000413190400023
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.scopus.citedcount 5
gdc.wos.citedcount 5

Files