EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT GLAZE TREATMENTS ON THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES AND ROUGHNESS OF LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMICS

dc.contributor.authorMeryem Gülce SUBAŞI
dc.contributor.authorGülce Alp
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:19:40Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:19:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempKütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Kütahya, Türkiye İstanbul Okan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul Türkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate effects of different glaze procedures on the colour,translucency, and roughness of lithium disilicate (LDS) ceramics after short-termageing.Materials and Methods: Eighteen LDS specimens (thickness: 0.6 mm) weredivided into three groups (paste (EP), spray (ES), and powder–liquid glaze (EL))based on the type of glaze treatment (n=6). After glaze firings, specimens werethermally aged (5000 cycles). Before and after thermocycling, the colour,translucency, and roughness values of the specimens were measured. Before andafter thermocycling, the translucency and roughness data were analysed using aone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared using a Wilcoxon signedrank test. Changes in colour, translucency, and roughness data were analysedusing one-way ANOVA, and the correlations between them were analysed usingSpearman’s correlation analysis (p=.05).Results: The EL group showed the highest and clinically unacceptable colourchange value (p≤.005). Before and after ageing, the EL group exhibited highertranslucency than the other groups (p<.001), and the EL and EP groups exhibitedhigher roughness values than the ES group (p≤.001). Wilcoxon signed-rank testresults showed that although a significant difference between the initial and finaltranslucency values was observed in the EL group (p=.028), no significantdifferences between the initial and final roughness values were observed in eachgroup. Only in the EL group, a significant correlation was found between thecolour and translucency change values (r=.943, p=.005).Conclusions: After short-term ageing, based on the evaluation of the LDSceramics' colour and translucency changes, ES and EP treatments are preferablefor glazing. When dentists select a material (EP, EL, ES) for glazing LDSceramics, they should consider the effects of this material on the optical propertiesand surface roughness of LDS ceramics.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/ cumudj.500975
dc.identifier.endpage55en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-5805
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage48en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid386031
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/ cumudj.500975
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/386031/effects-of-different-glaze-treatments-on-the-optical-properties-and-roughness-of-lithium-disilicate-ceramics
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1828
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEFFECTS OF DIFFERENT GLAZE TREATMENTS ON THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES AND ROUGHNESS OF LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMICSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files