Essay question generator based on bloom's taxonomy for assessing automated essay scoring system

dc.authorscopusid57207793414
dc.authorscopusid56366094100
dc.authorscopusid55430320600
dc.contributor.authorContreras,J.O.
dc.contributor.authorHilles,S.
dc.contributor.authorBakar,Z.A.
dc.contributor.otherYazılım Mühendisliği / Software Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:34:06Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempContreras J.O., Al Madinah International University, Taman Desa Petaling, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Hilles S., Istabul Okan University, Tepeören Mahallesi Tuzla Kampüsü, Istanbul, Turkey; Bakar Z.A., Al Madinah International University, Taman Desa Petaling, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysiaen_US
dc.description.abstractAn automated essay scoring system (AES) is advantageous in evaluating student's learning outcomes since it gives them the chance to exhibit their knowledge. Most of the AES is using machine learning (ML) to enhance student's scores but did not consider the proper construction of the essay questions. This study aims to integrate the cognitive level of Blooms' taxonomy (BT) in constructing essay questions and compare the scores of the student. Identifying the most appropriate ML method in classifying essay exam questions (EEQ) based on BT that will be embedded in the Essay Question Generator (EQG). Using F1-Measure, the evaluation results show that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) (85.7%) outperforms Naïve Bayes (82.6%) and K-Nearest Neighbor (77.6%). Therefore, SVM together with the NLP techniques is applied to automatically extract essay questions from the given text for the teachers to select and apply. The EQG was evaluated using the scores of 375 students who answered two sets of essay exam questions using Bloom's Taxonomy (BT) and without Bloom's taxonomy (NBT). Using frequency distribution, the scores between two types were evaluated and the result shows that most students performed well in answering the essay exam using BT 5.6% of the students obtains a perfect score of 5.0 but nobody got 5.0 for NBT. In a conclusion, this study shows that the essay questions constructed according to BT cognitive level produce higher scores using EQG when compared to exam questions prepared by the teachers. © 2021 IEEE.en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ICSCEE50312.2021.9498166
dc.identifier.endpage62en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-166543222-1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114853316
dc.identifier.startpage55en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCEE50312.2021.9498166
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2543
dc.institutionauthorHılles, Shadı
dc.institutionauthorHılles, Shadı
dc.institutionauthorHilles S.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartof2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise: Ubiquitous, Adaptive, and Sustainable Computing Solutions for New Normal, ICSCEE 2021 -- 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise, ICSCEE 2021 -- 15 June 2021 through 16 June 2021 -- Virtual, Online -- 171212en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBlooms taxonomyen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectNatural language processingen_US
dc.subjectSupport vector machineen_US
dc.titleEssay question generator based on bloom's taxonomy for assessing automated essay scoring systemen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9dba487b-db52-4f8b-b971-62bc137bc6cf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9dba487b-db52-4f8b-b971-62bc137bc6cf
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationaa8eb769-f77a-4335-b38a-e69cdccb17eb
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaa8eb769-f77a-4335-b38a-e69cdccb17eb

Files