Effects of Denture Base Thicknesses and Reinforcement on Fracture Strength in Mandibular Implant Overdenture with Bar Attachment: Under Various Acrylic Resin Types

dc.contributor.author Tokgoz,S.
dc.contributor.author Ozdiler,A.
dc.contributor.author Gencel,B.
dc.contributor.author Bozdag,E.
dc.contributor.author Islk-Ozkol,G.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:33:01Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:33:01Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract Objective This study aimed to assess the effect of reinforcement, denture base thickness, and acrylic resin types on dynamic and static fracture strength in mandibular implant overdentures with bar attachment. Materials and Methods One hundred and eight experimental mandibular implant overdentures with bar attachments were fabricated in three main groups, namely unreinforced (control: C), reinforced with unidirectional glass fibers (FR), and Co-Cr cast metal (MR). Each group included denture bases of 2-, 3-, and 4-mm thicknesses and produced with conventional (CA) and high-impact acrylic (HIA) resins. Specimens were thermocycled (5,000 times, 5-55°C) then subjected to a 400,000 cyclic load regime. Unbroken specimens were then loaded until fracture by a universal testing machine. Differences in mean fracture resistance among the groups were compared using the one-way analysis of variance (with post hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference test) and Student's t -tests (α = 0.05). Results Fracture strength increased significantly when the denture base thickness was increased (p = 0.001). The 2-mm denture base thickness was not enough for reinforcement. The fracture strength of the FR groups was significantly higher than other groups for 3- and 4-mm thicknesses (p = 0.001). The fracture strength of the HIA resin was significantly higher than CA resin in FR groups (p = 0.029 and p = 0.001). MR groups showed the weakest fracture strength. Conclusions The 2-mm denture base thickness had sufficient fracture strength without reinforcement and a positive relationship between acrylic resin thickness and fracture resistance was found. © 2019 Dental Investigation Society. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Istanbul Üniversitesi, (2097–47444, ONAP 1509–42829) en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 11
dc.identifier.doi 10.1055/s-0039-1688533
dc.identifier.issn 1305-7456
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85068034216
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688533
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2422
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Georg Thieme Verlag en_US
dc.relation.ispartof European Journal of Dentistry en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject denture base thickness en_US
dc.subject dynamic loading en_US
dc.subject overdenture en_US
dc.title Effects of Denture Base Thicknesses and Reinforcement on Fracture Strength in Mandibular Implant Overdenture with Bar Attachment: Under Various Acrylic Resin Types en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57209542177
gdc.author.scopusid 56563983600
gdc.author.scopusid 49663271300
gdc.author.scopusid 8628408800
gdc.author.scopusid 57209534970
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Okan University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Tokgoz S., Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istnabul Okan University, Istanbul, 34947, Turkey; Ozdiler A., Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istnabul Okan University, Istanbul, 34947, Turkey; Gencel B., Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Prosthesis Technologies, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey; Bozdag E., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory of Biomechanics and Strength of Materials, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey; Islk-Ozkol G., Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istnabul Okan University, Istanbul, 34947, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 68 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 64 en_US
gdc.description.volume 13 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.scopus.citedcount 13

Files