Which one is the most limited movement in restricted shoulder joint

dc.authorscopusid57208685332
dc.authorscopusid57225440857
dc.contributor.authorSaldiran,T.C.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz,O.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:33:02Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:33:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempSaldiran T.C., Istanbul Okan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey; Yilmaz O., Haliç University, School of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose. The purpose of the study was to determine the most restrictive range of motion of the shoulder joint before treatment, as well as to examine which range of motion makes the treatment most difficult during physical therapy. Methods. Overall, 35 patients of a physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic who met the inclusion criteria were involved in the study. Active range of motion was measured and recorded by physiotherapists using a universal goniometer in standard positions. Functional range of motion was evaluated with the constant-Murley Score (cMS) sub-parameters. The participants were given standard physical therapy routinely performed in the clinic, 3 sessions per week for 5 weeks. At the end of the treatment, the range of motion assessments were repeated. Results. Pre-treatment percentages were 43.24% for external rotation, 43.78% for internal rotation, 51.70% for abduction, 67.73% for flexion, 85.52% for extension. Post-treatment percentages were 62.50% for internal rotation, 72.54% for external rotation, 77.89% for abduction, 89.73% for flexion, 99.49% for extension. After treatment, the mean values of cMS sub-parameters were 9.71 ± 0.86 for flexion, 9.60 ± 0.95 for abduction, 8.57 ± 1.91 for external rotation, and 6.91 ± 2.13 for internal rotation. Pre- and post-treatment differences were observed to be statistically significant for the variables in the cMS (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The study showed that early recovery of rotational movements, especially the internal rotation movement, at the beginning of the treatment positively affected the treatment process. © University School of Physical Education in Wroclawen_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/hm.2019.83220
dc.identifier.endpage78en_US
dc.identifier.issn1732-3991
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065530232
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage72en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2019.83220
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2429
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity School of Physical Education in Wroclawen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Movementen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectInternal rotationen_US
dc.subjectLimitationen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectShoulder jointen_US
dc.titleWhich one is the most limited movement in restricted shoulder jointen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files