Effects of Open Versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

dc.contributor.authorArzu ATICI
dc.contributor.authorPınar AKPINAR
dc.contributor.authorİlknur AKTAŞ PALAS
dc.contributor.authorFatma KALAYCI YÜKSEK
dc.contributor.authorNuray GİRGİN
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:20:23Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:20:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye Okan Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of openversus closed kinetic chain exercises in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in this study. Material and Methods: Thirty eightpatients with knee OA were randomized into two groups as the openkinetic chain exercise (OKCE) group (n = 19) and the closed kineticchain exercise (CKCE) group (n = 19). All subjects received physicaltherapy modalities including 20 minute Hot Pack (HP), 20 minuteTranscuteneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and 20 minuteShort Wave Diatermi. A total of 18 sessions were held. The CKCEand OKCE were performed 30 minutes/day under the researcher’s supervision. Then the patients continued to exercise at home for 3weeks. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form HealthSurvey (SF-36) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used in the assessment of the patients before and after 6 weeks of exercise programme. Results: We found statistically significant improvement inVAS values, WOMAC pain, physical function and total WOMACscores and SF-36 quality of life after treatment in both OCKE and CKCEgroups in patients with knee OA (p<0.05). When we compared the ratesof change after treatment, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: As a result, we believethat the intensity and continuity of exercise may be more important thanthe type of exercise in the rehabilitation of knee OAen_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.31609/jpmrs.2019-72390
dc.identifier.endpage173en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-3843
dc.identifier.issn1307-7384
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage167en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid368307
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31609/jpmrs.2019-72390
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/368307/effects-of-open-versus-closed-kinetic-chain-exercises-in-patients-with-knee-osteoarthritis
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1899
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEffects of Open Versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files