Effect of Acid Etching and Er: YAG Laser Enamel Conditioning on the Microleakage of Glass Carbomer Fissure Sealants

dc.authoridÖzveren, Neslihan/0000-0002-1090-5415
dc.authoridsesen uslu, yesim/0000-0001-9601-7410
dc.authorwosidÖzveren, Neslihan/AAO-4681-2020
dc.authorwosidDONMEZ, NAZMİYE/KGK-5724-2024
dc.authorwosidsesen uslu, yesim/ITV-6937-2023
dc.contributor.authorOzveren, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Yesim Sesen
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Nazmiye
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:29:52Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:29:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Ozveren, Neslihan] Trakya Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Edirne, Turkey; [Uslu, Yesim Sesen] Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Donmez, Nazmiye] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionÖzveren, Neslihan/0000-0002-1090-5415; sesen uslu, yesim/0000-0001-9601-7410en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Er:YAG laser used alone or in combination with acid etching as surface conditioners on the microleakage of a glass carbomer fissure sealant for permanent molar teeth. Methods: Forty sound human permanent molar teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups based on enamel etching methods: group I, no surface conditioning; group II, 37% phosphoric acid etching; group III, Er:YAG laser etching; and group IV, sequential laser etching and acid etching. After surface conditioning procedures were conducted, the teeth were sealed with a glass carbomer seal. The teeth were subjected to thermocycling with 2500 cycles at 5 +/- 2 degrees C to 55 +/- 2 degrees C for 24 h. Subsequent microleakage was assessed via dye penetration under a stereomicroscope. Results: Group II showed the lowest microleakage scores. Groups III and IV exhibited similar score distribution, which was lower than that of group I. Conclusions: Laser etching and acid etching decrease the microleakage probability of glass carbomer sealants, and acid etching alone provides a more suitable surface for these sealants. Sequential laser etching and acid etching have no additional benefit in comparison with acid etching alone and yield worse results than those of the other tested methods.en_US
dc.identifier.citation4
dc.identifier.doi10.14693/jdi.v27i1.1112
dc.identifier.endpage12en_US
dc.identifier.issn1693-9697
dc.identifier.issn2355-4800
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v27i1.1112
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2155
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000605179800002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniv indonesia, Fac dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectfissure sealanten_US
dc.subjectglass carbomeren_US
dc.subjectpermanent molaren_US
dc.subjectmicroleakageen_US
dc.titleEffect of Acid Etching and Er: YAG Laser Enamel Conditioning on the Microleakage of Glass Carbomer Fissure Sealantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files