A LESS INVASIVE APPROACH IN ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: SPINO-SEMILAMINA-FACET SPARING TECHNIQUE

dc.authorscopusid 55941444300
dc.authorscopusid 56909997800
dc.authorscopusid 56406676400
dc.authorscopusid 6506143205
dc.contributor.author Koban,O.
dc.contributor.author Öǧrenci,A.
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz,M.
dc.contributor.author Dalbayrak,S.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:33:24Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:33:24Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Koban O., Okan University Hospital, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Öǧrenci A., Okan University Hospital, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Yilmaz M., Neurospinal Academy, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Dalbayrak S., Okan University Hospital, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: Our study aimed to describe the Spino-Semilamina-Facet Sparing Technique for the surgical treatment of patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and to present our clinical results. Materials and Methods: Forty-four patients who were treated with the above-mentioned technique between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. We included patients with grade 1 isthmic listhesis on neutral lumbar X-rays, who usually had a dominant unilateral radicular pain, but did not require discectomy via the approach side. The 12th month low back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, leg pain VAS scores and Oswestry Disability index (ODI) scores were analysed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: The average age of the patients was 46.3 years. Significant improvements were observed in the patients' radicular VAS scores at the approached side 12 months after the surgery (p<0.0001). There were also statistically significant improvements in minor radicular complaints when decompression was performed from the contralateral side compared to when it was done on the approached side (p<0.0001). Significant improvements were observed when ODI and low back pain VAS scores were compared between the preoperative and postoperative periods (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively). To date, no additional intervention was applied to any patient. Conclusion: The technique described in our study provides less invasive principles. The biggest advantages are that there is no need to perform a total laminectomy and the clinical outcomes are favourable. © 2020 Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2020.240
dc.identifier.endpage 166 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-0336
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85149891019
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 160 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2020.240
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2480
dc.identifier.volume 31 en_US
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Galenos Publishing House en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Isthmic spondylolisthesis en_US
dc.subject less invasive listhesis surgery en_US
dc.subject spino-semilamina-facet sparing en_US
dc.title A LESS INVASIVE APPROACH IN ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: SPINO-SEMILAMINA-FACET SPARING TECHNIQUE en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files