Updating the Signal-to-cutoff Level to Reduce Anti-hepatitis C Virus False Positivity

dc.authorscopusid 57216472351
dc.authorscopusid 6602534012
dc.contributor.author Oztürk,S.
dc.contributor.author Ağalar,C.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:34:04Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:34:04Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Oztürk S., Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey; Ağalar C., Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Fenerbahçe University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) is the only screening test being used in the diagnosis of hepatitis C. In this study, we examined anti-HCV positivity rates in our hospital. Objectives: The aim of administering the anti-HCV test was to distinguish patients with hepatitis C infection from false positivity in patients with reactive results. Methods: The anti-HCV tests were performed at Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The patients were evaluated retrospectively in terms of age, gender, anti-HCV titer, the clinic for which the examination was requested, the reason for the examination, and the history of hepatitis C. Results: In this study, 511 patients who had two negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were evaluated as false positive cases and enrolled. The cut-off value was found to be 7.5 IU/ml, with the highest sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 94.5% (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.982). The lowest anti-HCV titer (5.2) was from patients without acute hepatitis, who were HCV-RNA positive and diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C. Conclusions: It may be more appropriate to report anti-HCV cut-off value of 0-5 as negative, 5-7.5 as borderline, and > 7.5 as positive. Working with a more acceptable cut-off level with a greater number of tests can help identify patients with asymptomatic HCV infection. Also, it can possibly reduce the cost due to a decrease in the number of PCR tests administered. © 2021, Author(s). en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.5812/JJM.119110
dc.identifier.issn 2008-3645
dc.identifier.issue 10 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85125112344
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5812/JJM.119110
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2534
dc.identifier.volume 14 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Kowsar Medical Institute en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Anti-hepatitis C virus en_US
dc.subject False positive en_US
dc.subject Hepatitis C virus en_US
dc.subject S/Co en_US
dc.subject Signal-to-cutoff en_US
dc.title Updating the Signal-to-cutoff Level to Reduce Anti-hepatitis C Virus False Positivity en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files