EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT GLAZE TREATMENTS ON THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES AND ROUGHNESS OF LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMICS

dc.contributor.author Meryem Gülce SUBAŞI
dc.contributor.author Gülce Alp
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:19:40Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:19:40Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Kütahya, Türkiye İstanbul Okan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul Türkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To investigate effects of different glaze procedures on the colour,translucency, and roughness of lithium disilicate (LDS) ceramics after short-termageing.Materials and Methods: Eighteen LDS specimens (thickness: 0.6 mm) weredivided into three groups (paste (EP), spray (ES), and powder–liquid glaze (EL))based on the type of glaze treatment (n=6). After glaze firings, specimens werethermally aged (5000 cycles). Before and after thermocycling, the colour,translucency, and roughness values of the specimens were measured. Before andafter thermocycling, the translucency and roughness data were analysed using aone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared using a Wilcoxon signedrank test. Changes in colour, translucency, and roughness data were analysedusing one-way ANOVA, and the correlations between them were analysed usingSpearman’s correlation analysis (p=.05).Results: The EL group showed the highest and clinically unacceptable colourchange value (p≤.005). Before and after ageing, the EL group exhibited highertranslucency than the other groups (p<.001), and the EL and EP groups exhibitedhigher roughness values than the ES group (p≤.001). Wilcoxon signed-rank testresults showed that although a significant difference between the initial and finaltranslucency values was observed in the EL group (p=.028), no significantdifferences between the initial and final roughness values were observed in eachgroup. Only in the EL group, a significant correlation was found between thecolour and translucency change values (r=.943, p=.005).Conclusions: After short-term ageing, based on the evaluation of the LDSceramics' colour and translucency changes, ES and EP treatments are preferablefor glazing. When dentists select a material (EP, EL, ES) for glazing LDSceramics, they should consider the effects of this material on the optical propertiesand surface roughness of LDS ceramics. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 2
dc.identifier.doi 10.7126/ cumudj.500975
dc.identifier.endpage 55 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1302-5805
dc.identifier.issn 2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 48 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 386031
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.7126/ cumudj.500975
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/386031/effects-of-different-glaze-treatments-on-the-optical-properties-and-roughness-of-lithium-disilicate-ceramics
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1828
dc.identifier.volume 22 en_US
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartof Cumhuriyet Dental Journal en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Diğer en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT GLAZE TREATMENTS ON THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES AND ROUGHNESS OF LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMICS en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files