General Surgeons’ Approach to Pilonidal Abscess in Turkey: Results of a Nationwide Survey

dc.contributor.author Yildirim, Ali Cihat
dc.contributor.author Kozan, Ramazan
dc.contributor.author Sevim, Yusuf
dc.contributor.author Kıvılcım, Taner
dc.contributor.author Tatar, Cihad
dc.contributor.author Aydın, İshak
dc.contributor.author Karahan, Salih Nafiz
dc.date.accessioned 2025-08-15T19:24:00Z
dc.date.available 2025-08-15T19:24:00Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi,Gazi Üniversitesi,Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi,İstanbul Okan Üniversitesi,Tanımlanmamış Kurum,Çukurova Üniversitesi,Tanımlanmamış Kurum,Koç Üniversitesi,Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi,İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi,Trakya Üniversitesi,Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi,T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı,İstanbul Üniversitesi,Koç Üniversitesi en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim: This nationwide survey study aimed to determine the initial and definitive treatment strategies for pilonidal abscess (PA) that are used by general surgeons in Turkey. Method: Surgeons working at centers in Turkey were sent an electronic questionnaire focusing on diagnostic, perioperative, and postoperative management options for PA. The questions were prepared based on an extensive assessment of the literature and were evaluated for usability prior to distribution. A survey consisting of 20 questions was sent to surgeons and surgical residents via email. The survey link was kept active for 1 month to give the surgeons enough time to complete it. Results: Of the 520 participants, 64% defined themselves as general surgeons and 9.5% as colorectal surgeons. The most preferred surgical approaches among the participants were as follows: day surgery unit (75.2%), local anesthesia (82.8%), and drainage through the most fluctuant location (65.1%). Irrigation of the cavity was applied by 70% of the participants (38.8% with saline and 32.3% with hydrogen peroxide). The majority (82.5%) prescribed oral antibiotics following PA drainage. Definitive treatment was scheduled within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks by 45.6%. Participants who performed concurrent phenol application were more likely to perform a definitive treatment if the patient becomes symptomatic (p<0.001, odds ratio: 10,819, 95% confidence interval: 2,682-43,645). Conclusion: The study revealed that there are different approaches to the management of PA among surgeons in Turkey. Guidelines and consensus studies should be conducted to achieve the best results in the management of PA. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2024.2024-5-2
dc.identifier.endpage 61 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2536-4898
dc.identifier.issn 2536-4901
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 54 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1316073
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2024.2024-5-2
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1316073/general-surgeons-approach-to-pilonidal-abscess-in-turkey-results-of-a-nationwide-survey
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/8251
dc.identifier.volume 34 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title General Surgeons’ Approach to Pilonidal Abscess in Turkey: Results of a Nationwide Survey en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files