Legal Implications Regarding Micromobility Systems From Administrative and Criminal Aspects

dc.authorscopusid 59650727200
dc.authorscopusid 59650727300
dc.contributor.author Dilekci, S.
dc.contributor.author Duysak, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-03-15T20:27:45Z
dc.date.available 2025-03-15T20:27:45Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Dilekci S., Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Duysak M., Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract The swift integration of e-scooters into daily life has taken many countries by surprise. While some have expanded their bicycle-related regulations, others have introduced new rules for e-scooters to address this shift. As e-scooters become more popular, countries have implemented various strategies to reduce accidents and behaviors that could disrupt traffic flow, aiming to create a safer environment for both riders and pedestrians. Regulations regarding e-scooters vary significantly from one country to another, and even between cities. These regulations cover aspects such as the vehicle category, maximum speed limits, parking rules, age restrictions, helmet requirements, restrictions on the maximum power of e-scooters in public areas, appropriate road usage, and whether registration or insurance is necessary. Regulations tailored to each country’s specific needs, developed with input from various stakeholders such as the public, e-scooter companies, shared e-scooter operators, and other road users, are likely to be more effective than a single universal regulation applied across all countries. Criminal liabilities related to the use of bicycles and e-scooters can arise from willful or reckless harm or endangerment. If a driver intentionally injures someone, or an animal, or damages property, they may face criminal charges, with the use of the vehicle potentially worsening the offense depending on the country. Similarly, deliberately causing danger, such as driving on sidewalks, can also be criminal, varying by country. Negligence, like ignoring traffic rules or riding without lights, can result in lower penalties compared to intentional acts, though penalties are higher if the driver is aware of potential risks but still breaks the rules. Finally, negligent actions, such as improper parking of shared vehicles, can also pose dangers. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025. en_US
dc.identifier.citation 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/978-3-031-77098-2_18
dc.identifier.endpage 293 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2366-259X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85218712969
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 269 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77098-2_18
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/7756
dc.identifier.volume Part F47 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Kitap Bölümü - Uluslararası en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Bicyclists en_US
dc.subject Criminal Liabilities en_US
dc.subject E-Scooter Riders en_US
dc.subject Legal Regulations en_US
dc.subject Negligence en_US
dc.subject Traffic Rules en_US
dc.title Legal Implications Regarding Micromobility Systems From Administrative and Criminal Aspects en_US
dc.type Book Part en_US

Files