Which one is the most limited movement in restricted shoulder joint

dc.authorscopusid 57208685332
dc.authorscopusid 57225440857
dc.contributor.author Saldiran,T.C.
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz,O.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:33:02Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:33:02Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Saldiran T.C., Istanbul Okan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey; Yilmaz O., Haliç University, School of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose. The purpose of the study was to determine the most restrictive range of motion of the shoulder joint before treatment, as well as to examine which range of motion makes the treatment most difficult during physical therapy. Methods. Overall, 35 patients of a physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic who met the inclusion criteria were involved in the study. Active range of motion was measured and recorded by physiotherapists using a universal goniometer in standard positions. Functional range of motion was evaluated with the constant-Murley Score (cMS) sub-parameters. The participants were given standard physical therapy routinely performed in the clinic, 3 sessions per week for 5 weeks. At the end of the treatment, the range of motion assessments were repeated. Results. Pre-treatment percentages were 43.24% for external rotation, 43.78% for internal rotation, 51.70% for abduction, 67.73% for flexion, 85.52% for extension. Post-treatment percentages were 62.50% for internal rotation, 72.54% for external rotation, 77.89% for abduction, 89.73% for flexion, 99.49% for extension. After treatment, the mean values of cMS sub-parameters were 9.71 ± 0.86 for flexion, 9.60 ± 0.95 for abduction, 8.57 ± 1.91 for external rotation, and 6.91 ± 2.13 for internal rotation. Pre- and post-treatment differences were observed to be statistically significant for the variables in the cMS (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The study showed that early recovery of rotational movements, especially the internal rotation movement, at the beginning of the treatment positively affected the treatment process. © University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.5114/hm.2019.83220
dc.identifier.endpage 78 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1732-3991
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85065530232
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 72 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2019.83220
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2429
dc.identifier.volume 20 en_US
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Human Movement en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 2
dc.subject Internal rotation en_US
dc.subject Limitation en_US
dc.subject Physiotherapy en_US
dc.subject Shoulder joint en_US
dc.title Which one is the most limited movement in restricted shoulder joint en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files