Comparison of Apical Transportation and Canal Straightening Between Protaper Next, Hyflex, Reciproc and Reciproc Blue Instruments

dc.authorscopusid 37027247700
dc.authorscopusid 59758654100
dc.authorscopusid 57218644929
dc.authorscopusid 7006275390
dc.contributor.author Türkyilmaz, A.
dc.contributor.author Erdoğan, D.
dc.contributor.author Akbal Dinçer, G.
dc.contributor.author Erdemir, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-07-15T19:03:54Z
dc.date.available 2025-07-15T19:03:54Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Türkyilmaz A.] Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey; [Erdoğan D.] Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey; [Akbal Dinçer G.] Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Okan University, İstanbul, Turkey; [Erdemir A.] Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: This study aimed to compare apical transportation and canal straightening of ProTaper Next, HyFlex Electric Discharge Machining, Reciproc and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium (NiTi) files with different apical enlargements. Methods: Forty-eight mandibular molar human teeth were included in the study. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the NiTi file types (n=12). A digital radiographic method was used to compare apical transportation and canal straightening in the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions using before-and-after images superimposed with Image J software. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and the Wilcoxon test were used; the P value was set at 5%. Results: The maximum transportation of the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions were 0.216 mm and 0.196 mm with Reciproc file. The maximum straightening of the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions were degrees of 8.661 and 8.048 respectively with ProTaper Next and Reciproc files. Conclusion: ProTaper Next, HyFlex Electric Discharge Machining and Reciproc Blue filespresented similar results. Using a larger instrument increased the apical transportation and canal straightening. © 2022, Selcuk University. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.15311/selcukdentj.887570
dc.identifier.endpage 408 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2148-7529
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105007652435
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 402 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.887570
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/8091
dc.identifier.volume 9 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Selcuk University en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Selcuk Dental Journal en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Apical Transportation en_US
dc.subject Canal Straightening en_US
dc.subject HyFlex EDM en_US
dc.subject ProTaper Next en_US
dc.subject Reciproc Blue en_US
dc.title Comparison of Apical Transportation and Canal Straightening Between Protaper Next, Hyflex, Reciproc and Reciproc Blue Instruments en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files