Evaluation of biomechanical effects of prosthetic components with different materials on the abutment screw

dc.authorscopusid57222483984
dc.authorscopusid57462475900
dc.authorscopusid25822008700
dc.contributor.authorGökay,G.D.
dc.contributor.authorGökçimen,G.
dc.contributor.authorDurkan,R.
dc.contributor.otherProtetik Diş Tedavisi / Prosthetic Dental Treatment
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:34:01Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:34:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempGökay G.D., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey; Gökçimen G., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey; Durkan R., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of different resin-based and ceramic superstructure materials and two different abutment types on the stress distribution of the abutment screw using the method of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Materials and Methods: A three-dimensional implant, abutment (zirconia and titanium), abutment screw, crown (zirconia reinforced lithium silicate, lithium disilicate, polymer-infiltrated resin ceramic, and PEEK), and alveolar bone were designed using Rhinoceros 3D modeling software and VRMesh Studio software to form 8 simulations. On the models prepared, loading was made on the lingual tubercle of the maxillary right first premolar crown at an angle of 30° with 150 N force obliquely in the buccolingual direction. The von Mises stress values obtained from the abutment screw were compared according to the types of abutment and crown materials. Results: The von Mises stress values in the abutment screw were higher in the models using a titanium abutment (on average 1336.24 MPa), and the lower stress values were obtained in the models using a zirconia abutment (on average 964.26 MPa). When the prosthetic material used was changed, the stress values on the abutment screw was similar. Conclusions: Considering that the abutment screw is the weakest component of the implant-system, zirconia abutments can be used reliably in the maxillary first premolar region where aesthetic expectations are high. © 2021,Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. all rights reserveden_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cumudj.982237
dc.identifier.endpage345en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125059776
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage337en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1137300
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.982237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2523
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.institutionauthorDurkan, Rukiye
dc.institutionauthorDurkan, Rukiye
dc.institutionauthorDurkan R.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental abutmentsen_US
dc.subjectDental stress analysisen_US
dc.subjectGlass ceramicsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of biomechanical effects of prosthetic components with different materials on the abutment screwen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbb6eaac4-8520-4ab0-94b6-3eeddb11c13e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybb6eaac4-8520-4ab0-94b6-3eeddb11c13e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication436b3c72-243c-4a2c-b7b8-c99fdf2046c0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery436b3c72-243c-4a2c-b7b8-c99fdf2046c0

Files