Perceptual conflict and response competition: Event-related potentials of the stroop effect

dc.authorscopusid9735101000
dc.authorscopusid55945937900
dc.contributor.authorBekçi,B.
dc.contributor.authorKarakaş,S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T20:21:54Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T20:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempBekçi B., Okan University, Psychology Department, Istanbul, Turkey; Karakaş S., Hacettepe University, Psychology Department, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to analyze electrophysiological activity associated with the Stroop effect. Method: The sample included 50 healthy volunteer adults (23 female and 27 male) from the university population. Stimulation, recording and analyses were carried under NeuroScan 4.2 hardware-software system. The effect of the experimental variables (stimulus congruency, response accuracy and electrode location) on event-related potentials (ERPs) was studied using 2×2×3 analysis of variance for repeated measures. Results: The Stroop effect was demonstrated as prolonged reaction time to incongruent stimuli and increased total number of missed stimuli. Principal components analysis (PCA) showed that Stroop performance was related such factors as selective attention, interference, and resistance to interference. The electrophysiological Stroop effect was demonstrated as increased amplitude of P3 and N4 peaks for incongruent stimuli, and of N2, P3, N3, and N4 peaks for incorrect responses. Conclusion: Increased amplitude of P3 and N4 peaks associated with stimulus-related activation has been suggested to reflect conflict detection process. The variations in amplitudes for incorrect responses were complicated. While the amplitude of the N2 and P3 components increased only for incongruent stimuli, those of the N3 and N4 components increased for both congruent and incongruent stimuli. It was concluded that these earlier and later activations were associated with response competition and error detection processes, respectively. In this respect, these findings support both the perceptual conflict and the response competition hypotheses of Stroop interference.en_US
dc.identifier.citation10
dc.identifier.doi[SCOPUS-DOI-BELIRLENECEK-161]
dc.identifier.endpage10en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-2163
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19504363
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-68649120248
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/6695
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Association of Nervous and Mental Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Psikiyatri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEvent-related potentialsen_US
dc.subjectPerceptual conflicten_US
dc.subjectResponse competitionen_US
dc.subjectStroop effecten_US
dc.titlePerceptual conflict and response competition: Event-related potentials of the stroop effecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files