Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

dc.authorscopusid35798520900
dc.authorscopusid57204580296
dc.authorscopusid56695207700
dc.authorscopusid57205505728
dc.authorscopusid55177017500
dc.authorscopusid16232854700
dc.contributor.authorKartal,A.
dc.contributor.authorAydın,H.O.
dc.contributor.authorOduncu,M.
dc.contributor.authorFerhatoğlu,M.F.
dc.contributor.authorKıvılcım,T.
dc.contributor.authorFiliz,A.İ.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:32:34Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:32:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempKartal A., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Aydın H.O., Department of General Surgery, Başkent University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Oduncu M., Department of General Surgery, Defne Hospital, Antakya, Turkey; Ferhatoğlu M.F., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Kıvılcım T., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Filiz A.İ., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractOur study aims to compare the surgical outcome of Limberg transposition flap, Karydakis flap, and primary closure after excision to treat sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. A total of 634 patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent surgery were evaluated retrospectively from January 2014 to January 2016. The patients were divided into three groups. Limberg transposition flap (LTF) was performed in 131 patients (group 1), Karydakis flap (KF) was performed in 232 patients (group 2) and primary closure (PC) after excision was performed in 271 patients (group 3). Patient demographics, operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed retrospectively. The mean age (p=0.98), sex ratio (p=0.74) and removed sinus volume (p=0.67) were not statistically different between groups. Mean operative time was 54.3 ± 6.4 min for group 1, 46.8 ± 10.5 min for group 2, and 26.9 ± 5.8 min for group 3 respectively (p=0.01). When the length of hospital stay was compared, there was a significant difference in favor of primary closure (p=0.01). Regarding early surgical complication, Karydakis flap technique was superior to other groups (p<0.001). The recurrent rate was higher in the primary closure group (p<0.001). In our study, the primary closure method regarding the duration of surgery and hospitalization; Karydakis method regarding postoperative complications (seroma, hematoma, wound dissociation, infection, recurrence) were superior to the other two methods.en_US
dc.identifier.citation7
dc.identifier.doi10.14712/23362936.2019.2
dc.identifier.endpage155en_US
dc.identifier.issn1214-6994
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPubMed:30779699
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85061850450
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage148en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2019.2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2398
dc.identifier.volume119en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPrague medical reporten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectPerforator flapen_US
dc.subjectPilonidal sinusen_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectRhomboid flapen_US
dc.titleComparison of Three Surgical Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files