Comparison of percutaneous access and open femoral cutdown in elective endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms;

dc.authorscopusid58373586900
dc.authorscopusid57194017437
dc.authorscopusid56637916200
dc.authorscopusid57444563700
dc.authorscopusid57217870084
dc.authorscopusid55315145500
dc.authorscopusid6602600863
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut,M.
dc.contributor.authorAk,A.
dc.contributor.authorArslan,Ö.
dc.contributor.authorAkardere,Ö.F.
dc.contributor.authorKarakoç,A.Z.
dc.contributor.authorGume,S.
dc.contributor.authorTuncer,M.A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:34:37Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempAkbulut M., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ak A., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Arslan Ö., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Akardere Ö.F., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Karakoç A.Z., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gume S., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Şişmanoğlu M., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Tuncer M.A., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of percutaneous access and femoral cutdown methods for elective bifurcated endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: Between November 2013 and September 2020, a total of 152 patient (135 males, 17 females; mean age: 70.6±6, range, 57 to 87 years) who underwent endovascular repair due to infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were retrospectively analyzed. According to femoral access type, the patients were grouped into two groups as the total percutaneous femoral access and open cutdown femoral access endovascular repair. Intra and postoperative data were compared, including operative time, amount of contrast media, bleeding requiring transfusion, return to the operating room, access vessel complications, wound complications, and overall length of hospital stay. Results: Eighty-seven (57.2%) femoral cutdown access repair and 65 (42.8%) percutaneous femoral access repair cases were evaluated in the study. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05), except for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which was more frequent in the percutaneous access group (p=0.014). After adjustment, age, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity were not predictive of percutaneous access failure. Percutaneous femoral access was observed as the only preventing factor for wound infection (odds ratio=0.166, 95% confidence interval: 0.036-0.756; p=0.021). Conclusion: Although femoral access preference does not affect mortality and re-intervention rates, percutaneous endovascular repair reduces operation time, hospital stay, and wound site complications compared to femoral artery exposures. © 2022. All right reserved by the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.identifier.citation1
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.21898
dc.identifier.endpage17en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-5680
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124287631
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage11en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1170769
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.21898
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2599
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBaycinar Medical Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbdominalen_US
dc.subjectAortaen_US
dc.subjectAortic aneurysmsen_US
dc.subjectCommon femoral arteryen_US
dc.subjectEndovascular proceduresen_US
dc.titleComparison of percutaneous access and open femoral cutdown in elective endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms;en_US
dc.title.alternativeElektif abdominal aort anevrizmalarının endovasküler onarımında perkütan erişim ve açık femoral cutdown karşılaştırmasıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files