Analysis of morphological parameters in pelvic radiography and hip MRI: A practical reporting recommendation

dc.authorscopusid 57192111773
dc.authorscopusid 36196212400
dc.contributor.author Cicek,E.D.
dc.contributor.author Cevik,H.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:34:12Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:34:12Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Cicek E.D., Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Cevik H., Department of Radiology, Okan University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Although numerous criteria have been proposed to define abnormal hip morphology, mostly used in the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement, it is not a practical approach to measure all of these parameters in all cases without clinical suspicion. In this study, our aim was to develop an evaluating and reporting standardization for routine hip examinations to define both hip morphology and impingement. A total of 108 patients with routine hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and antero-posterior pelvic radiograph (PR) were included in this retrospective study. Alpha angle (AA), acetabular depth (AD), acetabular protrusion, acetabular anteversion, collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis angle (TA) were measured. The differences and associations between these parameters were evaluated according to imaging modality or plane, and sex. Although a significant difference has been found between the axial AA and the coronal AA mean values measured on MRI, there was also a strong correlation. Coronal measurements were significantly higher. AA values measured in PR and coronal MRI were comparable. Males had higher AA in both planes as compared to females. There were no significant differences between CDA values in MRI and PR. There was a significant difference and a moderate correlation between AD values in MRI and PR. We suggest that routine reports should include a measurement of AA in two planes, and measurement of CDA in PR or MRI. Due to the difference in AD between MRI and radiography, LCEA or TA may represent better alternatives. Checking for a negative Tönnis sign would represent a practical approach. © 2021, Acta Orthopædica Belgica. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.52628/87.2.11
dc.identifier.endpage 283 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0001-6462
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid PubMed:34529381
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85115932992
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 275 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.11
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2557
dc.identifier.volume 87 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher ARSMB-KVBMG en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Acta Orthopaedica Belgica en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Femoroacetabular impingement en_US
dc.subject Hip morphology en_US
dc.subject Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) en_US
dc.subject Pelvic radiography (PR) en_US
dc.subject Reporting en_US
dc.subject Tönnis sign en_US
dc.title Analysis of morphological parameters in pelvic radiography and hip MRI: A practical reporting recommendation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files