Utility of vibratory stimulation for reducing intraoral injection pain

dc.authorscopusid36916526700
dc.authorscopusid57204964372
dc.authorscopusid57204970410
dc.authorscopusid57952703300
dc.authorscopusid57213900519
dc.contributor.authorErdogan,O.
dc.contributor.authorSinsawat,A.
dc.contributor.authorPawa,S.
dc.contributor.authorRintanalert,D.
dc.contributor.authorVuddhakanok,S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T12:32:26Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T12:32:26Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-tempErdogan O., Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Okan University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey; Sinsawat A., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand; Pawa S., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand; Rintanalert D., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand; Vuddhakanok S., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailanden_US
dc.description.abstractIntraoral local anesthesia injection is often perceived as a painful and anxiety-causing dental procedure. Vibration stimulus is one of the nonpharmacologic methods used to reduce unwanted sensations of local anesthesia injection. This clinical study evaluated the effectiveness of a recently introduced vibratory stimulation device in intraoral local anesthesia administration. Thirty-two subjects underwent 2 maxillary local anesthesia injections in 2 different sessions: 1 with conventional techniques and 1 with the aid of a vibratory stimulation device (DentalVibe). The pain levels were evaluated with a visual analog scale and the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The subjects were asked to choose the preferred method for future injections. The data were evaluated statistically. There were no significant differences between the 2 injection methods with regard to either pain evaluation method. The preference of the subjects regarding future injection technique was evenly distributed between the groups. The vibratory stimulation device used in this study did not provide any reduction in pain level associated with maxillary infiltration local anesthesia administration. © 2018 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRangsit University, RSU, (RSEC-49/2558)en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount8
dc.identifier.doi10.2344/anpr-65-02-01
dc.identifier.endpage99en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3006
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPubMed:29952639
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058180819
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage95en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-65-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2386
dc.identifier.volume65en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAllen Press Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnesthesia Progressen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount10
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectLocal anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectVibratory stimulationen_US
dc.titleUtility of vibratory stimulation for reducing intraoral injection painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files