Comparison of five convolutional neural networks for predicting osteoporosis based on mandibular cortical index on panoramic radiographs

dc.authoridOZIC, MUHAMMET USAME/0000-0002-3037-2687
dc.authorwosidTassoker, Melek/AAE-4230-2022
dc.contributor.authorTassoker, Melek
dc.contributor.authorOzic, Muhammet Usame
dc.contributor.authorYuce, Fatma
dc.contributor.otherAğız,Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi / Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:26:29Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:26:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Tassoker, Melek] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Fac Dent, Konya, Turkey; [Ozic, Muhammet Usame] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Denizli, Turkey; [Yuce, Fatma] Okan Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionOZIC, MUHAMMET USAME/0000-0002-3037-2687en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of the present study was to compare five convolutional neural networks for predicting osteoporosis based on mandibular cortical index (MCI) on panoramic radiographs. Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 744 female patients over 50 years of age were labeled as C1, C2, and C3 depending on the MCI. The data of the present study were reviewed in different categories including (C1, C2, C3), (C1, C2), (C1, C3), and (C1, (C2 +C3)) as two-class and three-class predictions. The data were separated randomly as 20% test data, and the remaining data were used for training and validation with fivefold cross-validation. AlexNET, GoogleNET, ResNET-50, SqueezeNET, and ShuffleNET deep-learning models were trained through the transfer learning method. The results were evaluated by performance criteria including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, AUC, and training duration. The Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) method was applied for visual interpretation of where deep-learning algorithms gather the feature from image regions. Results: The dataset (C1, C2, C3) has an accuracy rate of 81.14% with AlexNET; the dataset (C1, C2) has an accuracy rate of 88.94% with GoogleNET; the dataset (C1, C3) has an accuracy rate of 98.56% with AlexNET; and the dataset (C1,(C2+C3)) has an accuracy rate of 92.79% with GoogleNET. Conclusion: The highest accuracy was obtained in the differentiation of C3 and C1 where osseous structure characteristics change significantly. Since the C2 score represent the intermediate stage (osteopenia), structural characteristics of the bone present behaviors closer to C1 and C3 scores. Therefore, the data set including the C2 score provided relatively lower accuracy results.en_US
dc.identifier.citation8
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20220108
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.issn1476-542X
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35762349
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220108
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/974
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000965801300009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.institutionauthorYüce, Fatma
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBritish inst Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_US
dc.subjectPanoramic Radiographyen_US
dc.subjectDeep Learningen_US
dc.titleComparison of five convolutional neural networks for predicting osteoporosis based on mandibular cortical index on panoramic radiographsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1fddf36f-243e-452b-ac5b-74fecce20900
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1fddf36f-243e-452b-ac5b-74fecce20900
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication33e9adf7-24b8-4809-953d-2505653ca467
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery33e9adf7-24b8-4809-953d-2505653ca467

Files