Explaining the Advocacy Agenda: Insights from the Human Security Network

dc.authoridMontgomery, Alexander/0000-0003-4166-0534
dc.authoridDuygulu, Sirin/0000-0001-6264-3819
dc.authorscopusid18036789400
dc.authorscopusid56134406100
dc.authorscopusid23100816200
dc.authorscopusid56134108500
dc.authorwosidDuygulu Elcim, Sirin/JKH-9899-2023
dc.authorwosidMontgomery, Alexander/B-4969-2009
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Charli
dc.contributor.authorDuygulu, Sirin
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Alexander H.
dc.contributor.authorRapp, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-25T11:24:07Z
dc.date.available2024-05-25T11:24:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentOkan Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Carpenter, Charli; Duygulu, Sirin] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA; [Duygulu, Sirin] Okan Univ, Istanbul, Turkey; [Montgomery, Alexander H.] Reed Coll, Portland, OR 97202 USA; [Montgomery, Alexander H.] Woodrow Wilson Int Ctr Scholars, Washington, DC 20004 USAen_US
dc.descriptionMontgomery, Alexander/0000-0003-4166-0534; Duygulu, Sirin/0000-0001-6264-3819en_US
dc.description.abstractThrough a series of focus groups with human security practitioners, we examined how powerful organizations at the center of advocacy networks select issues for attention. Participants emphasized five sets of factors: entrepreneur attributes, adopter attributes, the broader political context, issue attributes, and intranetwork relations. However, the last two were much more consistently invoked by practitioners in their evaluations of specific candidate issues. Scholars of global agenda setting should pay particular attention to how intranetwork relations structure gatekeeper preferences within transnational advocacy spaces because these help constitute perceptions of issues' and actors' attributes in networks.en_US
dc.identifier.citation45
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0020818313000453
dc.identifier.endpage470en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-8183
dc.identifier.issn1531-5088
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84899484415
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage449en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000453
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/761
dc.identifier.volume68en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000334924600007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword Available]en_US
dc.titleExplaining the Advocacy Agenda: Insights from the Human Security Networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files