Evaluation of biomechanical effects of prosthetic components with different materials on the abutment screw

dc.authorscopusid 57222483984
dc.authorscopusid 57462475900
dc.authorscopusid 25822008700
dc.contributor.author Gökay,G.D.
dc.contributor.author Gökçimen,G.
dc.contributor.author Durkan,R.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:34:01Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:34:01Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Gökay G.D., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey; Gökçimen G., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey; Durkan R., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of different resin-based and ceramic superstructure materials and two different abutment types on the stress distribution of the abutment screw using the method of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Materials and Methods: A three-dimensional implant, abutment (zirconia and titanium), abutment screw, crown (zirconia reinforced lithium silicate, lithium disilicate, polymer-infiltrated resin ceramic, and PEEK), and alveolar bone were designed using Rhinoceros 3D modeling software and VRMesh Studio software to form 8 simulations. On the models prepared, loading was made on the lingual tubercle of the maxillary right first premolar crown at an angle of 30° with 150 N force obliquely in the buccolingual direction. The von Mises stress values obtained from the abutment screw were compared according to the types of abutment and crown materials. Results: The von Mises stress values in the abutment screw were higher in the models using a titanium abutment (on average 1336.24 MPa), and the lower stress values were obtained in the models using a zirconia abutment (on average 964.26 MPa). When the prosthetic material used was changed, the stress values on the abutment screw was similar. Conclusions: Considering that the abutment screw is the weakest component of the implant-system, zirconia abutments can be used reliably in the maxillary first premolar region where aesthetic expectations are high. © 2021,Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. all rights reserved en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.7126/cumudj.982237
dc.identifier.endpage 345 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85125059776
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 337 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1137300
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.982237
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2523
dc.identifier.volume 24 en_US
dc.institutionauthor Durkan, Rukiye
dc.institutionauthor Durkan R.
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Cumhuriyet Dental Journal en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Dental abutments en_US
dc.subject Dental stress analysis en_US
dc.subject Glass ceramics en_US
dc.title Evaluation of biomechanical effects of prosthetic components with different materials on the abutment screw en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files