Perceptual conflict and response competition: Event-related potentials of the stroop effect

dc.authorscopusid 9735101000
dc.authorscopusid 55945937900
dc.contributor.author Bekçi,B.
dc.contributor.author Karakaş,S.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-15T20:21:54Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-15T20:21:54Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Bekçi B., Okan University, Psychology Department, Istanbul, Turkey; Karakaş S., Hacettepe University, Psychology Department, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze electrophysiological activity associated with the Stroop effect. Method: The sample included 50 healthy volunteer adults (23 female and 27 male) from the university population. Stimulation, recording and analyses were carried under NeuroScan 4.2 hardware-software system. The effect of the experimental variables (stimulus congruency, response accuracy and electrode location) on event-related potentials (ERPs) was studied using 2×2×3 analysis of variance for repeated measures. Results: The Stroop effect was demonstrated as prolonged reaction time to incongruent stimuli and increased total number of missed stimuli. Principal components analysis (PCA) showed that Stroop performance was related such factors as selective attention, interference, and resistance to interference. The electrophysiological Stroop effect was demonstrated as increased amplitude of P3 and N4 peaks for incongruent stimuli, and of N2, P3, N3, and N4 peaks for incorrect responses. Conclusion: Increased amplitude of P3 and N4 peaks associated with stimulus-related activation has been suggested to reflect conflict detection process. The variations in amplitudes for incorrect responses were complicated. While the amplitude of the N2 and P3 components increased only for incongruent stimuli, those of the N3 and N4 components increased for both congruent and incongruent stimuli. It was concluded that these earlier and later activations were associated with response competition and error detection processes, respectively. In this respect, these findings support both the perceptual conflict and the response competition hypotheses of Stroop interference. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 10
dc.identifier.endpage 10 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-2163
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 19504363
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-68649120248
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/6695
dc.identifier.volume 20 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Turkish Association of Nervous and Mental Health en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 10
dc.subject Event-related potentials en_US
dc.subject Perceptual conflict en_US
dc.subject Response competition en_US
dc.subject Stroop effect en_US
dc.title Perceptual conflict and response competition: Event-related potentials of the stroop effect en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files