Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

dc.contributor.author Kartal,A.
dc.contributor.author Aydın,H.O.
dc.contributor.author Oduncu,M.
dc.contributor.author Ferhatoğlu,M.F.
dc.contributor.author Kıvılcım,T.
dc.contributor.author Filiz,A.İ.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:32:34Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:32:34Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.description.abstract Our study aims to compare the surgical outcome of Limberg transposition flap, Karydakis flap, and primary closure after excision to treat sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. A total of 634 patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent surgery were evaluated retrospectively from January 2014 to January 2016. The patients were divided into three groups. Limberg transposition flap (LTF) was performed in 131 patients (group 1), Karydakis flap (KF) was performed in 232 patients (group 2) and primary closure (PC) after excision was performed in 271 patients (group 3). Patient demographics, operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed retrospectively. The mean age (p=0.98), sex ratio (p=0.74) and removed sinus volume (p=0.67) were not statistically different between groups. Mean operative time was 54.3 ± 6.4 min for group 1, 46.8 ± 10.5 min for group 2, and 26.9 ± 5.8 min for group 3 respectively (p=0.01). When the length of hospital stay was compared, there was a significant difference in favor of primary closure (p=0.01). Regarding early surgical complication, Karydakis flap technique was superior to other groups (p<0.001). The recurrent rate was higher in the primary closure group (p<0.001). In our study, the primary closure method regarding the duration of surgery and hospitalization; Karydakis method regarding postoperative complications (seroma, hematoma, wound dissociation, infection, recurrence) were superior to the other two methods. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 7
dc.identifier.doi 10.14712/23362936.2019.2
dc.identifier.issn 1214-6994
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85061850450
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2019.2
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2398
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher NLM (Medline) en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Prague medical report en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Complication en_US
dc.subject Perforator flap en_US
dc.subject Pilonidal sinus en_US
dc.subject Recurrence en_US
dc.subject Rhomboid flap en_US
dc.title Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 35798520900
gdc.author.scopusid 57204580296
gdc.author.scopusid 56695207700
gdc.author.scopusid 57205505728
gdc.author.scopusid 55177017500
gdc.author.scopusid 16232854700
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Okan University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Kartal A., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Aydın H.O., Department of General Surgery, Başkent University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Oduncu M., Department of General Surgery, Defne Hospital, Antakya, Turkey; Ferhatoğlu M.F., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Kıvılcım T., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Filiz A.İ., Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 155 en_US
gdc.description.issue 4 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 148 en_US
gdc.description.volume 119 en_US
gdc.identifier.pmid PubMed:30779699
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.scopus.citedcount 9

Files