Factors Affecting the Level of Reflective Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making Skills in Medical Faculty Students

dc.authorwosid SARIKAYA, OZLEM/IXW-5364-2023
dc.contributor.author Hafiz, Aysenur Meric
dc.contributor.author Senturk, Erol
dc.contributor.author Teker, Cenk
dc.contributor.author Sarikaya, Ozlem
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:27:52Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:27:52Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Hafiz, Aysenur Meric] Marmara Univ, Dept Med Educ, Inst Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Senturk, Erol] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept ENT, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Teker, Cenk] Imperial Coll, Sch Med, London, England; [Sarikaya, Ozlem] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Educ, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reflection skills of students at the Faculty of Medicine and the factors influencing these skills, as well as to measure the impact of students' reflection skills on their clinical decision-making.Methods: This study is an educational research project conducted on fifth-year Ear Nose Throat (ENT) interns at Vakif University's Faculty of Medicine. The "Reflective Thinking Level Determination Scale" and the "Clinical Decision-Making Scale," which are valid and reliable, were used to assess the reflection skills and clinical decision-making abilities of the 125 students participating in the study.Results: In our study, the mean score of the sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale was 77.04 +/- 5.14 for the fifthyear student population surveyed. Scores from the "Self-Reflection" and "Reflective Communication" sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale were compared based on gender, participation in summer internships, receipt of scholarships, membership in social sciences clubs, place of residence, school attended, diary-keeping habits, study styles, and cities of residence. Although there were some differences between the groups, these differences were not statistically significant. The total scores of the students on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale sub-dimensions ranged from 98 to 169, with a mean score of 146.18 +/- 10.97. A statistically positive and moderate correlation was found between the total scores of the participants on the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale and the total scores they obtained on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale (r=0.403; p=0.001).Conclusion: Consequently, an increase in the reflection skills of participants is associated with higher clinical decision-making scores. Reflection is the primary means of transitioning students from novices to experts, enhancing both comprehensive learning and learning experiences. Therefore, every medical school should develop a training program for student reflection, along with a feedback and assessment system integrated into the curriculum. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223
dc.identifier.endpage 551 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1302-7123
dc.identifier.issn 1308-5123
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 38268663
dc.identifier.startpage 543 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1106
dc.identifier.volume 57 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001136225000013
dc.institutionauthor Sarıkaya, Özlem
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Kare Publ en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Clinical decision making en_US
dc.subject medical education en_US
dc.subject reflection en_US
dc.subject reflective thinking en_US
dc.title Factors Affecting the Level of Reflective Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making Skills in Medical Faculty Students en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 1

Files