Comparison of percutaneous access and open femoral cutdown in elective endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms;

dc.authorscopusid 58373586900
dc.authorscopusid 57194017437
dc.authorscopusid 56637916200
dc.authorscopusid 57444563700
dc.authorscopusid 57217870084
dc.authorscopusid 55315145500
dc.authorscopusid 6602600863
dc.contributor.author Akbulut,M.
dc.contributor.author Ak,A.
dc.contributor.author Arslan,Ö.
dc.contributor.author Akardere,Ö.F.
dc.contributor.author Karakoç,A.Z.
dc.contributor.author Gume,S.
dc.contributor.author Tuncer,M.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:34:37Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:34:37Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Akbulut M., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ak A., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Arslan Ö., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Akardere Ö.F., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Karakoç A.Z., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gume S., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Şişmanoğlu M., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Tuncer M.A., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of percutaneous access and femoral cutdown methods for elective bifurcated endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: Between November 2013 and September 2020, a total of 152 patient (135 males, 17 females; mean age: 70.6±6, range, 57 to 87 years) who underwent endovascular repair due to infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were retrospectively analyzed. According to femoral access type, the patients were grouped into two groups as the total percutaneous femoral access and open cutdown femoral access endovascular repair. Intra and postoperative data were compared, including operative time, amount of contrast media, bleeding requiring transfusion, return to the operating room, access vessel complications, wound complications, and overall length of hospital stay. Results: Eighty-seven (57.2%) femoral cutdown access repair and 65 (42.8%) percutaneous femoral access repair cases were evaluated in the study. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05), except for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which was more frequent in the percutaneous access group (p=0.014). After adjustment, age, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity were not predictive of percutaneous access failure. Percutaneous femoral access was observed as the only preventing factor for wound infection (odds ratio=0.166, 95% confidence interval: 0.036-0.756; p=0.021). Conclusion: Although femoral access preference does not affect mortality and re-intervention rates, percutaneous endovascular repair reduces operation time, hospital stay, and wound site complications compared to femoral artery exposures. © 2022. All right reserved by the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.21898
dc.identifier.endpage 17 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-5680
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85124287631
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 11 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1170769
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.21898
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2599
dc.identifier.volume 30 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Baycinar Medical Publishing en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 3
dc.subject Abdominal en_US
dc.subject Aorta en_US
dc.subject Aortic aneurysms en_US
dc.subject Common femoral artery en_US
dc.subject Endovascular procedures en_US
dc.title Comparison of percutaneous access and open femoral cutdown in elective endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms; en_US
dc.title.alternative Elektif abdominal aort anevrizmalarının endovasküler onarımında perkütan erişim ve açık femoral cutdown karşılaştırması en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files