Marginal Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-Based Restorations After Conventional Cavity Preparation and Er: Yag Laser Irradiation

dc.authorid Donmez, Nazmiye/0000-0002-5101-6155
dc.authorid kaynar, zeynep buket/0000-0002-2612-1009
dc.contributor.author Kaynar, Zeynep Buket
dc.contributor.author Donmez, Nazmiye
dc.contributor.author Siso, Seyda Herguner
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:27:11Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:27:11Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp İSTANBUL OKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ,BEZMİÂLEM VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİ,İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of glass ionomer restorations (GIC) in Class V cavities prepared with both conventional and Er: YAG laser techniques. Methods: Twenty teeth were used. Standard Class V cavities (4mm wide,3m high,3mm deep) were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of teeth. All teeth were randomly divided into four groups. In Groups II and IV, cavities were prepared by Er: YAG laser, and in Groups I and III cavities were conventionally prepared with a diamond bur. Groups I and II were then restored with conventional GIC (Ketac,3MEspe, U.S.A.).Groups III and IV were restored with high viscosity GIC with resin coating (EQUIA, GC, Tokyo, Japan). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24h. Teeth were then subjected to thermo-cycling (500 cycles,5°C-55°C). All teeth were exposed to 50.000 cycles in a chewing simulator. Specimens were stained with 0.5% aqueous basic fuchsin dye and sectioned buccolingually. Dye penetration was scored under a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: While the highest microleakage scores were observed in the group prepared with Er: YAG laser and restored with conventional GIC the lowest microleakage scores were observed in the group prepared with Er: YAG laser and restored with high viscosity GIC. When cavities prepared with Er: YAG laser or conventional method were restored with high viscosity GIC, no statistically significant difference was found between them (p> 0.05). Conclusion: High viscosity GIC can be preferred as a restorative material in the restorations of Class V cavities prepared using both conventional and Er: YAG lasers. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.30621/jbachs.955091
dc.identifier.endpage 711 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2458-8938
dc.identifier.issn 2564-7288
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 703 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1274438
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.955091
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1274438/marginal-microleakage-of-glass-ionomer-based-restorations-after-conventional-cavity-preparation-and-er-yag-laser-irradiation
dc.identifier.volume 6 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000877003600002
dc.institutionauthor Kaynar, Zeynep Buket
dc.institutionauthor Kaynar, Zeynep Buket
dc.language.iso en
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Dokuz Eylul Univ inst Health Sciences en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject glass ionomer en_US
dc.subject microleakage en_US
dc.subject high viscosity glass ionomer en_US
dc.subject Er en_US
dc.subject YAG laser en_US
dc.title Marginal Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-Based Restorations After Conventional Cavity Preparation and Er: Yag Laser Irradiation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0

Files