Utility of vibratory stimulation for reducing intraoral injection pain

dc.authorscopusid 36916526700
dc.authorscopusid 57204964372
dc.authorscopusid 57204970410
dc.authorscopusid 57952703300
dc.authorscopusid 57213900519
dc.contributor.author Erdogan,O.
dc.contributor.author Sinsawat,A.
dc.contributor.author Pawa,S.
dc.contributor.author Rintanalert,D.
dc.contributor.author Vuddhakanok,S.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T12:32:26Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T12:32:26Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp Erdogan O., Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Okan University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey; Sinsawat A., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand; Pawa S., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand; Rintanalert D., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand; Vuddhakanok S., Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumtani, Thailand en_US
dc.description.abstract Intraoral local anesthesia injection is often perceived as a painful and anxiety-causing dental procedure. Vibration stimulus is one of the nonpharmacologic methods used to reduce unwanted sensations of local anesthesia injection. This clinical study evaluated the effectiveness of a recently introduced vibratory stimulation device in intraoral local anesthesia administration. Thirty-two subjects underwent 2 maxillary local anesthesia injections in 2 different sessions: 1 with conventional techniques and 1 with the aid of a vibratory stimulation device (DentalVibe). The pain levels were evaluated with a visual analog scale and the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The subjects were asked to choose the preferred method for future injections. The data were evaluated statistically. There were no significant differences between the 2 injection methods with regard to either pain evaluation method. The preference of the subjects regarding future injection technique was evenly distributed between the groups. The vibratory stimulation device used in this study did not provide any reduction in pain level associated with maxillary infiltration local anesthesia administration. © 2018 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Rangsit University, RSU, (RSEC-49/2558) en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 8
dc.identifier.doi 10.2344/anpr-65-02-01
dc.identifier.endpage 99 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0003-3006
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid PubMed:29952639
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85058180819
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 95 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-65-02-01
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/2386
dc.identifier.volume 65 en_US
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Allen Press Inc. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Anesthesia Progress en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 10
dc.subject Anxiety en_US
dc.subject Local anesthesia en_US
dc.subject Pain en_US
dc.subject Vibratory stimulation en_US
dc.title Utility of vibratory stimulation for reducing intraoral injection pain en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files