Influence of Clinical Operative Technique on Debris Extrusion of Two Reciprocating Files

dc.authorid Zanza, Alessio/0000-0002-2062-8140
dc.authorid TESTARELLI, Luca/0000-0003-3904-3000
dc.authorid Arican, Burcin/0000-0001-5757-0571
dc.authorscopusid 57204595215
dc.authorscopusid 56094357600
dc.authorscopusid 6507762818
dc.authorscopusid 7005345776
dc.authorscopusid 57217117716
dc.authorscopusid 57204165451
dc.authorwosid Ates, Ayfer Atav/ABC-2676-2022
dc.authorwosid Zanza, Alessio/AAR-3627-2021
dc.contributor.author Ates, Ayfer Atav
dc.contributor.author Arican, Burcin
dc.contributor.author Testarelli, Luca
dc.contributor.author Gambarini, Gianluca
dc.contributor.author Zanza, Alessio
dc.contributor.author Seracchiani, Marco
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:42:28Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:42:28Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Ates, Ayfer Atav; Arican, Burcin] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Istanbul, Turkey; [Testarelli, Luca] Univ Rome, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Sci, Rome, Italy; [Gambarini, Gianluca; Zanza, Alessio; Seracchiani, Marco] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Sci, Rome, Italy en_US
dc.description Zanza, Alessio/0000-0002-2062-8140; TESTARELLI, Luca/0000-0003-3904-3000; Arican, Burcin/0000-0001-5757-0571 en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: To compare the influence of different clinical operative motions (pecking motion vs. MIMERACI) on apical debris extrusion using WaveOne Gold and EdgeOne Fire reciprocating files in the mesiobuccal canal of extracted molars. Material and Methods: Sixty mandibular molar teeth with curvature less than 20 degrees were divided into 4 groups (n=15 each): G1A: WOG pecking Group; G1B: WOG MIMERACI Group; G2A: EOF pecking Group; and G2B: EOF MIMERACI Group. The produced debris was collected in the preweighed Eppendorf tubes and following the shaping procedures; they dried in the incubator for 5 days at 70 degrees C. The tubes were weighed again, and the final extruded debris was measured by subtracting the pre-instrumentation from post-instrumentation weight of tubes. The canal preparation time was calculated with a digital chronometer. The obtained data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA at a 0.05 level of significance. Results: MIMERACI method significantly decreased the amount of debris pushed out in both instruments (p<0.05). Neither instruments nor clinical motions created a statistical difference regarding the required time (p>0.05). Conclusion: All tested instruments pushed debris out apically at some level, but MIMERACI operative technique was associated with significantly less apical debris extrusion. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 2
dc.identifier.doi 10.1590/pboci.2021.114
dc.identifier.issn 1519-0501
dc.identifier.issn 1983-4632
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85112691323
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2021.114
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/1604
dc.identifier.volume 21 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000668849000001
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Assoc Apoio Pesquisa & Saude Bucal-apesb en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 3
dc.subject Endodontics en_US
dc.subject Root Canal Therapy en_US
dc.subject Root Canal Preparation en_US
dc.title Influence of Clinical Operative Technique on Debris Extrusion of Two Reciprocating Files en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 2

Files