A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF REGISTRATION METHODS USED IN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN CULTURAL HERITAGE APPLICATIONS

dc.authorid Gümüş, Münevver Gizem/0000-0003-4606-2277
dc.authorscopusid 36348344200
dc.authorscopusid 57199749969
dc.authorscopusid 35317359300
dc.authorwosid Gümüş, Münevver Gizem/O-6514-2017
dc.contributor.author Gumus, Kutalmis
dc.contributor.author Gumus, M. Gizem
dc.contributor.author Erkaya, Halil
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-25T11:20:21Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-25T11:20:21Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.department Okan University en_US
dc.department-temp [Gumus, Kutalmis; Gumus, M. Gizem] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Nigde, Turkey; [Erkaya, Halil] Okan Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description Gümüş, Münevver Gizem/0000-0003-4606-2277 en_US
dc.description.abstract Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) systems are used during surveying in cultural heritage applications, supported by recent developments in the electronics and computing. The aim of this article is to present a statistical study of the accuracy of registration methods (target (sphere), specific point and surface-matching) used for merged of the scans captured from different scan stations. A Mensi GS 100 terrestrial laser scanner was used to scan an historical building. The point clouds reflecting the building facade were registered using these registration methods and were transformed into the same geodesic coordinate system. A Leica TPS 1200 Total Station was used to measure the coordinates of specific points on the building facade and compare them with the coordinates of the same points using three different scan-registration methods. The t-student test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used for point-and method-based comparisons, and it was found that the coordinates did not exhibit any statistically significant variation. Better results were obtained with target-based registration methods compared to other methods, and with surface-matching methods compared to methods using specific points. Although the results of the registration methods used in this study had certain similarities, variation in their accuracy was determined to be statistically significant. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 3
dc.identifier.doi 10.5281/zenodo.1005466
dc.identifier.endpage 64 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1108-9628
dc.identifier.issn 2241-8121
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85038353087
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 53 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1005466
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14517/478
dc.identifier.volume 17 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000418897300005
dc.institutionauthor Erkaya H.
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Univ Agean, dept Mediterranean Stud en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 4
dc.subject Terrestrial Laser Scanning en_US
dc.subject Statistical analyze en_US
dc.subject Point Cloud en_US
dc.subject Registration en_US
dc.subject Cultural Heritage en_US
dc.title A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF REGISTRATION METHODS USED IN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN CULTURAL HERITAGE APPLICATIONS en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 3

Files